---
title: "Peking University: Beware of Metacognitive Laziness – Effects of Generative AI on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance"
slug: "peking-university-beware-of-metacognitive-laziness-effects-of-generative-ai-on-learning-motivation-processes-and-performance"
author: "Jeremy Weaver"
date: "2025-01-27 16:30:39"
category: "Premium"
topics: "Metacognitive Laziness in AI-Assisted Learning, Impact of ChatGPT on Essay Performance, Comparison of AI and Human Expert Support, Effects on Self-Regulated Learning and Intrinsic Motivation, Balancing AI Supplementation in Higher Education"
summary: "This study examined how using ChatGPT impacts university students' learning by comparing its use with human expert support, writing analytics tools, and no support. While ChatGPT improved essay scores, it did not significantly boost intrinsic motivation or knowledge transfer, suggesting an over-reliance on AI—termed \"metacognitive laziness\"—that may inhibit deeper learning."
banner: ""
thumbnail: ""
---

Peking University: Beware of Metacognitive Laziness – Effects of Generative AI on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance<br><br><iframe title="Peking University: Beware of Metacognitive Laziness – Effects of Generative AI on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance" allowtransparency="true" height="300" width="100%" style="border: none; min-width: min(100%, 430px);height:300px;" scrolling="no" data-name="pb-iframe-player" src="https://www.podbean.com/player-v2/?from=embed&i=ecutb-17d33d6-pb&square=1&share=1&download=1&fonts=Arial&skin=1&font-color=auto&rtl=0&logo_link=episode_page&btn-skin=7&size=300" loading="lazy" allowfullscreen=""></iframe><br><br><p>Summary of <a href='https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13544'>Read Full Report</a></p>
<p>Investigates the effects of using generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, on university students' learning. A randomized controlled trial compared students using ChatGPT to those using human expert support, writing analytics tools, or no support at all.</p>
<p>The study examined intrinsic motivation, self-regulated learning processes, and learning performance across different groups. Results showed ChatGPT improved essay scores but did not significantly enhance motivation or knowledge transfer, raising concerns about "metacognitive laziness"—over-reliance on AI hindering deeper learning.</p>
<p>The study concludes that AI should supplement, not replace, human interaction in education.</p>