Universities don’t need five different AI tools that don’t talk to each other. They need one education-native platform that supports everyday advising, faculty content creation, and back-office operations—with governance, analytics, and real cost control. That’s the point of ibl.ai: an interoperable application layer (with web/Python SDKs and a unified API) that lets campus teams ship multiple agentic workflows—not just chat.

Below are the high-impact, non-tutoring use cases we see institutions rolling out first.

---

Advising That’s Proactive, Personal, and Policy-Aware

What It Solves

Students need timely, in-bounds guidance—course sequencing, prerequisite checks, campus resources, internship tips—without waiting for office hours.

How It Works on ibl.ai

• Context that matters: Advising agents can responsibly reference student program, cohort, enrolled courses, and progression indicators via the platform’s Memory layer (under your rules).

• Policy-aware nudges: Additive safety and “stay-in-scope” prompts keep guidance aligned to institutional policies, approved resources, and course catalogs.

• Right place, right time: Embed advisors via LTI into any LMS (or on the web/mobile app) so help is one click away inside the LMS.

• Evidence, not vibes: xAPI events and built-in dashboards show who’s engaging, what topics spike (e.g., registration deadlines), and where students stall—so advising teams can intervene early.

Example Flow

A student asks, “Am I on track to finish by spring?” The agent checks declared major + completed units (Memory), offers a registrar-compliant path, and provides a one-click link to schedule with a human advisor. The interaction emits xAPI for program analytics and equity reviews.

Content Creation That Keeps Faculty In The Driver’s Seat

What It Solves

Faculty want speed without “black-box” content. They need reusable, editable outputs aligned to their pedagogy and outcomes.

How It Works on ibl.ai

• Human-in-the-loop by design: Generate lecture outlines, question banks, rubrics, case studies, and assignments—then refine, version, and publish.

• Course-aware generation: Ground outputs in approved readings, slides, and prior materials (RAG), so content matches the actual course—not generic summaries.

• Standards-based delivery: Publish back to your LMS via LTI or export to your preferred format.

• Model choice, lower costs: Route to OpenAI, Gemini, or Claude at developer rates; swap models without re-platforming.

Example Flow

An instructor drops new slides and readings into the mentor’s dataset, requests formative quiz items tagged to outcomes, reviews suggested distractors, and pushes to the LMS with gradebook mapping.

Operations That Remove Toil (and Error)

What It Solves

Admissions, IT, financial services, and alumni teams are overwhelmed by repetitive tasks that should be handled—or at least drafted—by agents.

How It Works on ibl.ai

• Multi-tenant, role-aware agents: Stand up one agent per office (or per workflow) with scoped permissions and datasets.

• Composable tools: Call external APIs (GET/POST) for status lookups, ticket creation, transcript verification, or CRM entry—under auditable policies.

• Queue to human: Keep a human-approval step for high-risk or sensitive actions; the agent assembles the packet and suggested response.

• Cost telemetry: Track cost per model/provider and per workflow so managers can prove ROI (and tune routing).

Example Flows

• Admissions triage: Extract application highlights, check prerequisites, draft a personalized reply, attach program links—then hand to staff for a 10-second approve/send.

• Financial aid FAQs: Answer policy questions using in-scope documents; escalate edge cases to a counselor with the full conversation attached.

• Alumni outreach: Summarize capacity indicators from approved records, draft call notes, and log them to CRM via tool calls.

What Makes This “One Platform,” Not “One More Tool”

• Education-native plumbing: LTI for seamless LMS embedding, xAPI for first-party analytics, plus NRPS/AGS for roster and grade workflows.

• Memory with governance: Maintain a structured student/context layer in your environment (on-prem or your cloud) with tenant isolation and fine-grained controls.

• Unified API + SDKs: Ship web or Python apps against the same backend that powers tutoring, advising, content creation, and ops—no new stack each time.

• Additive safety & domain scoping: Pre- and post-model moderation plus per-course/per-office “stay in scope” rules.

• Model routing at developer rates: Use the best model for each job (and switch later) without rewriting apps.

• Built-in analytics: Engagement, topics, quality signals, and cost in one place—plus xAPI streams for your LRS.

Getting Started: One Foundation, Many Wins

Most campuses begin with two or three agents:

• Course-aware tutor/advisor embedded in the LMS

• Faculty content assistant for quizzes/case studies/rubrics

• An operational agent (admissions, IT, or financial services) that drafts responses and updates systems via tool calls.

Once the platform is live, adding the fourth, fifth, and tenth agent is incremental—not a new vendor, budget request, or security review.

---

Conclusion

Tutoring is only the start. When the same education-native backbone powers advising, content creation, and operations, you get a coherent AI strategy: embedded where people already work (via LTI), governed by campus policy, measured with first-party analytics (via xAPI), and paid at developer rates instead of per-seat premiums. With ibl.ai as the platform, institutions can launch multiple high-value AI workflows—securely, measurably, and sustainably—without spinning up a new vendor for every use case. Visit https://ibl.ai/contact to learn more!