Harvard Business School: The Cybernetic Teammate – A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise
The paper shows that generative AI can act as a "cybernetic teammate" by considerably enhancing knowledge work. In field experiments at Procter & Gamble, individuals using AI achieved performance comparable to human teams, produced balanced solutions across functional lines, and experienced more positive emotions. Overall, the study suggests that AI not only boosts efficiency but also transforms team dynamics and innovation strategies.
Harvard Business School: The Cybernetic Teammate – A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise
Summary of https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5188231
This working paper details a field experiment examining the impact of generative AI on teamwork and expertise within Procter & Gamble. The study involved 776 professionals working on real product innovation challenges, randomly assigned to individual or team settings with or without AI assistance.
The research investigated how AI affects performance, expertise sharing across functional silos, and the social and emotional aspects of collaboration. Findings indicate that AI significantly enhances performance, allowing individuals with AI to match the output quality of traditional human teams. Moreover, AI facilitates the creation of more balanced solutions, regardless of professional background, and fosters more positive emotional responses among users.
Ultimately, the paper suggests that AI functions as a "cybernetic teammate," prompting organizations to reconsider team structures and the nature of collaborative work in the age of intelligent machines.
- AI significantly enhances performance in knowledge work, with individuals using AI achieving a level of solution quality comparable to two-person teams without AI. This suggests that AI can effectively replicate certain benefits of human collaboration in terms of output quality.
- AI breaks down functional silos and broadens expertise. Professionals using AI produced more balanced solutions that spanned both commercial and technical aspects, regardless of their professional background (R&D or Commercial). AI can also help individuals with less experience in product development achieve performance levels similar to teams with experienced members.
- AI fosters positive emotional responses among users. Participants reported more positive emotions (excitement, energy, enthusiasm) and fewer negative emotions (anxiety, frustration) when working with AI compared to working alone without AI, matching or even exceeding the emotional benefits traditionally associated with human teamwork.
- AI-augmented teams have a higher likelihood of generating exceptional, top-tier solutions. Teams working with AI were significantly more likely to produce solutions ranking in the top 10% of all submissions, indicating that the combination of human collaboration and AI can be particularly powerful for achieving breakthrough innovations.
- AI is not merely a tool but functions as a "cybernetic teammate" that reshapes collaboration. It dynamically interacts with human problem-solvers, provides real-time feedback, bridges expertise boundaries, and influences emotional states, suggesting a fundamental shift in how knowledge work can be structured and carried out.
Related Articles
Students as Agent Builders: How Role-Based Access (RBAC) Makes It Possible
How ibl.ai’s role-based access control (RBAC) enables students to safely design and build real AI agents—mirroring industry-grade systems—while institutions retain full governance, security, and faculty oversight.
AI Equity as Infrastructure: Why Equitable Access to Institutional AI Must Be Treated as a Campus Utility — Not a Privilege
Why AI must be treated as shared campus infrastructure—closing the equity gap between students who can afford premium tools and those who can’t, and showing how ibl.ai enables affordable, governed AI access for all.
Pilot Fatigue and the Cost of Hesitation: Why Campuses Are Stuck in Endless Proof-of-Concept Cycles
Why higher education’s cautious pilot culture has become a roadblock to innovation—and how usage-based, scalable AI frameworks like ibl.ai’s help institutions escape “demo purgatory” and move confidently to production.
AI Literacy as Institutional Resilience: Equipping Faculty, Staff, and Administrators with Practical AI Fluency
How universities can turn AI literacy into institutional resilience—equipping every stakeholder with practical fluency, transparency, and confidence through explainable, campus-owned AI systems.