ibl.ai Agentic AI Blog

Insights on building and deploying agentic AI systems. Our blog covers AI agent architectures, LLM infrastructure, MCP servers, enterprise deployment strategies, and real-world implementation guides. Whether you are a developer building AI agents, a CTO evaluating agentic platforms, or a technical leader driving AI adoption, you will find practical guidance here.

Topics We Cover

Featured Research and Reports

We analyze key research from leading institutions and labs including Google DeepMind, Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta AI, McKinsey, and the World Economic Forum. Our content includes detailed analysis of reports on AI agents, foundation models, and enterprise AI strategy.

For Technical Leaders

CTOs, engineering leads, and AI architects turn to our blog for guidance on agent orchestration, model evaluation, infrastructure planning, and building production-ready AI systems. We provide frameworks for responsible AI deployment that balance capability with safety and reliability.

Back to Blog

Open Praxis: The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI – A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future

Jeremy WeaverFebruary 26, 2025
Premium

The manifesto critically examines generative AI in higher education, arguing that while it offers personalized learning and efficiency, it also risks reinforcing biases, eroding human creativity and judgment, and devaluing educators. It calls for ethical, evidence-based approaches that prioritize AI literacy and rethinking education to maintain human agency.

Open Praxis: The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI – A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future



Summary of Read Full Report (PDF)

This document presents a collaboratively written manifesto offering a critical examination of the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) in [higher education](/solutions/higher-education). It identifies both the positive and negative aspects of GenAI's influence on teaching and learning, stressing that it is not a neutral tool and risks reinforcing existing biases.

The manifesto calls for research-backed decision-making to ensure GenAI enhances human agency and promotes ethical responsibility in education. It also acknowledges that while GenAI has potential, educators must also think about the deprofessionalization of the education field if AI tools increasingly automate tasks like grading, tutoring, and content delivery, potentially leading to job displacement and reduced opportunities for educators.

The text explores the importance of AI literacy for users and also looks to the risks of human-AI symbiosis, including the erosion of human judgement, autonomy and creative agency. The authors hope to encourage debate and offer insight into the future of GenAI in educational contexts.

Here are the five main takeaways:

  • GenAI is not a neutral tool. It reflects worldviews and can reinforce biases, potentially marginalizing diverse voices.
  • GenAI can both enhance and diminish essential human elements in education. While it offers potential for personalized learning and efficiency, it also risks eroding creativity, critical thinking, and empathy.
  • Ethical considerations are paramount. Issues such as bias, fairness, transparency, and data security must be addressed to ensure responsible deployment of GenAI.
  • Educators, administrators, and policymakers need to rethink education. Continuing with 'business as usual' is not an option. A shift is needed to emphasize learning processes and adapt assessment methods.
  • Robust, evidence-based research is crucial. Decisions about integrating GenAI in education should be guided by a deep understanding of its impacts.

Related Articles

SaaS Fragmentation Is the Hidden Cost of Enterprise AI

Enterprises run six or seven per-seat tools that each hold a partial copy of the same customer. That fragmentation, not model capability, is what stalls AI deployment — and it carries a per-seat bill that grows with headcount. This post itemizes the fragmentation tax and shows the MCP-based orchestration layer that reads across every system instead of adding another one.

Miguel AmigotJuly 31, 2026

AI Budgets Are Growing 40% a Year. Deployment Isn't.

Enterprise AI investment is compounding near 40% a year — roughly double cloud and mobile at the same stage — yet most of it never reaches production. This post introduces deployment yield, the ratio of AI budget attached to systems real users touch, and shows why the missing control plane, not model capability, is what security and compliance actually block on.

Miguel AmigotJuly 31, 2026

The AI Harness Thesis: Orchestration Beats Model Selection

Enterprises spend their AI strategy debating which model to buy. The model is the commodity — it is replaced every few months and its price falls. The harness around it (retrieval, validation, routing, memory) is the durable asset, and it only compounds if you own it.

ibl.ai EngineeringJuly 29, 2026

Self-Hosted Voice AI Agents for Hospital Health Systems

What it actually costs to run outbound voice AI agents on hospital-owned infrastructure, which BAAs you still need, and where PHI travels during an AI phone call.

ibl.ai EngineeringJuly 28, 2026

See the ibl.ai AI Operating System in Action

Discover how leading universities and organizations are transforming education with the ibl.ai AI Operating System. Explore real-world implementations from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and users from 400+ institutions worldwide.

View Case Studies

Get Started with ibl.ai

Choose the plan that fits your needs and start transforming your educational experience today.