Open Praxis: The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI – A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future
The manifesto critically examines generative AI in higher education, arguing that while it offers personalized learning and efficiency, it also risks reinforcing biases, eroding human creativity and judgment, and devaluing educators. It calls for ethical, evidence-based approaches that prioritize AI literacy and rethinking education to maintain human agency.
Open Praxis: The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI – A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future
Summary of Read" class="text-blue-600 hover:text-blue-800" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://openpraxis.org/articles/777/files/6749b446d17e9.pdf'>Read Full Report (PDF)
This document presents a collaboratively written manifesto offering a critical examination of the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) in higher education. It identifies both the positive and negative aspects of GenAI's influence on teaching and learning, stressing that it is not a neutral tool and risks reinforcing existing biases.
The manifesto calls for research-backed decision-making to ensure GenAI enhances human agency and promotes ethical responsibility in education. It also acknowledges that while GenAI has potential, educators must also think about the deprofessionalization of the education field if AI tools increasingly automate tasks like grading, tutoring, and content delivery, potentially leading to job displacement and reduced opportunities for educators.
The text explores the importance of AI literacy for users and also looks to the risks of human-AI symbiosis, including the erosion of human judgement, autonomy and creative agency. The authors hope to encourage debate and offer insight into the future of GenAI in educational contexts.
Here are the five main takeaways:
- GenAI is not a neutral tool. It reflects worldviews and can reinforce biases, potentially marginalizing diverse voices.
- GenAI can both enhance and diminish essential human elements in education. While it offers potential for personalized learning and efficiency, it also risks eroding creativity, critical thinking, and empathy.
- Ethical considerations are paramount. Issues such as bias, fairness, transparency, and data security must be addressed to ensure responsible deployment of GenAI.
- Educators, administrators, and policymakers need to rethink education. Continuing with 'business as usual' is not an option. A shift is needed to emphasize learning processes and adapt assessment methods.
- Robust, evidence-based research is crucial. Decisions about integrating GenAI in education should be guided by a deep understanding of its impacts.
Related Articles
The MCP Context Window Problem: Why AI Agent Architecture Matters More Than Model Size
MCP servers are consuming up to 72% of AI agent context windows before a single user message is processed. Here is why smart agent architecture — not bigger models — is the real solution.
Amazon's AI Coding Crisis Reveals What Every Organization Needs: Controlled Agent Infrastructure
Amazon's recent production outages from AI coding agents reveal a fundamental truth: organizations need AI infrastructure they own and control. Here's what the industry can learn.
Why 1 Million Tokens of Context Changes Everything — If You Own the Infrastructure
Anthropic just made 1 million tokens of context generally available. Here's why long context only matters if the infrastructure running it belongs to you.
What Amazon's AI Coding Agent Outage Teaches Us About Deploying Agents in Production
Amazon's AI coding agent Kiro caused a 13-hour AWS outage by deleting a production environment. The incident reveals why organizations need owned, sandboxed AI infrastructure with proper governance — not just smarter models.
See the ibl.ai AI Operating System in Action
Discover how leading universities and organizations are transforming education with the ibl.ai AI Operating System. Explore real-world implementations from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and users from 400+ institutions worldwide.
View Case StudiesGet Started with ibl.ai
Choose the plan that fits your needs and start transforming your educational experience today.