UC Berkeley: Responsible Use of Generative AI – A Playbook for Product Managers and Business Leaders
This playbook offers product managers and business leaders strategies for using generative AI responsibly by addressing risks like data privacy, inaccuracy, and bias while enhancing transparency, compliance, and brand trust.
UC Berkeley: Responsible Use of Generative AI – A Playbook for Product Managers and Business Leaders
Summary of Read Full Report (PDF)
A playbook for product managers and business leaders seeking to responsibly use generative AI (genAI) in their work and products. It emphasizes proactively addressing risks like data privacy, inaccuracy, and bias to build trust and maintain accountability.
The playbook outlines ten actionable plays for organizational leaders and product managers to integrate responsible AI practices, improve transparency, and mitigate potential harms. It underscores the business benefits of responsible AI, including enhanced brand reputation and regulatory compliance.
Ultimately, the playbook aims to help organizations and individuals capitalize on genAI's potential while ensuring its ethical and sustainable implementation.
- GenAI has diverse applications and is used for automating work, generating content, transcribing voice, and powering new products and features.
- Organizations can use different genAI models. These include off-the-shelf tools, enterprise solutions, or open models, which can be customized for specific needs and products.
- Adoption of genAI can lead to increased productivity and efficiency. Organizations that address the risks associated with genAI are best positioned to capitalize on the benefits. Responsible AI practices can foster a positive brand image and customer loyalty.
- There are key risks product managers need to consider when using genAI, especially regarding data privacy, transparency, inaccuracy, bias, safety, and security.
- There are several challenges to using genAI responsibly, including a lack of organizational policies and individual education, the immaturity of the industry, and the replication of inequitable patterns that exist in society.
Related Articles
Gemini 3.1 Pro and the Case for Model-Agnostic Agentic Infrastructure
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro doubled its reasoning benchmarks overnight. Here's why that makes model-agnostic agentic infrastructure more critical than ever.
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro, ChatGPT Ads, and Why Organizations Need to Own Their AI Infrastructure
Google launches Gemini 3.1 Pro with advanced reasoning while OpenAI rolls out ads in ChatGPT. These two moves reveal a growing tension in enterprise AI: who controls the intelligence layer, and whose interests does it serve?
ChatGPT Now Has Ads — And It Should Change How You Think About AI Infrastructure
OpenAI has started showing ads inside ChatGPT responses. This marks a turning point: organizations relying on consumer AI tools are now subject to someone else's monetization strategy. Here's why owning your AI infrastructure matters more than ever.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Just Dropped — Here's What It Means for Organizations Running Their Own AI
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro launched today with 1M-token context, native multimodal reasoning, and agentic tool use. Here's why model releases like this one matter most to organizations that own their AI infrastructure — and why locking into a single provider is the costliest mistake you can make.
See the ibl.ai AI Operating System in Action
Discover how leading universities and organizations are transforming education with the ibl.ai AI Operating System. Explore real-world implementations from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and users from 400+ institutions worldwide.
View Case StudiesGet Started with ibl.ai
Choose the plan that fits your needs and start transforming your educational experience today.