University College London: How Human-AI Feedback Loops Alter Human Perceptual, Emotional and Social Judgements
This study finds that AI systems can amplify human biases when trained on slightly skewed data. Interactions with biased AI can further increase human bias, particularly when users view AI as more authoritative. However, accurate AI systems have the potential to improve human judgment.
University College London: How Human-AI Feedback Loops Alter Human Perceptual, Emotional and Social Judgements
Summary of https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02077-2
This research investigates how interactions between humans and AI can create feedback loops that amplify biases.The study reveals that AI algorithms, trained on slightly biased human data, not only adopt these biases but also magnify them.
When humans then interact with these biased AI systems, their own biases increase, demonstrating a concerning feedback mechanism. The researchers found this effect to be stronger in human-AI interactions than in human-human interactions, and that humans often underestimate the influence of AI on their judgments.
The study demonstrated that using an AI system like Stable Diffusion can increase social bias. Critically, the study shows that accurate AI can improve judgement, while flawed AI amplifies human biases.
Here are five key takeaways from the provided study on human-AI interaction:
- AI systems can amplify biases present in human data. When AI algorithms are trained on data that contains even slight human biases, the algorithms not only adopt these biases but often amplify them.
- Human interaction with biased AI increases human bias. Repeated interaction with biased AI systems leads humans to internalize and adopt the AI's biases, potentially creating a feedback loop where human judgment becomes increasingly skewed. This effect is stronger in human-AI interactions than in human-human interactions.
- The perception of AI influences its impact. Humans may be more susceptible to bias from AI systems if they perceive the AI as superior or authoritative. The study showed that even when interacting with an AI, if participants believed they were interacting with a human, the bias learned was less than if they knew it was an AI.
- Humans underestimate AI's biasing influence. People are often unaware of the extent to which AI systems affect their judgments, which can make them more vulnerable to adopting AI-driven biases.
- Accurate AI improves human judgment. The study also demonstrated that interaction with accurate AI systems can improve human decision-making, suggesting that reducing algorithmic bias has the potential to enhance the quality of human judgment.
Related Articles
Students as Agent Builders: How Role-Based Access (RBAC) Makes It Possible
How ibl.ai’s role-based access control (RBAC) enables students to safely design and build real AI agents—mirroring industry-grade systems—while institutions retain full governance, security, and faculty oversight.
AI Equity as Infrastructure: Why Equitable Access to Institutional AI Must Be Treated as a Campus Utility — Not a Privilege
Why AI must be treated as shared campus infrastructure—closing the equity gap between students who can afford premium tools and those who can’t, and showing how ibl.ai enables affordable, governed AI access for all.
Pilot Fatigue and the Cost of Hesitation: Why Campuses Are Stuck in Endless Proof-of-Concept Cycles
Why higher education’s cautious pilot culture has become a roadblock to innovation—and how usage-based, scalable AI frameworks like ibl.ai’s help institutions escape “demo purgatory” and move confidently to production.
AI Literacy as Institutional Resilience: Equipping Faculty, Staff, and Administrators with Practical AI Fluency
How universities can turn AI literacy into institutional resilience—equipping every stakeholder with practical fluency, transparency, and confidence through explainable, campus-owned AI systems.