University of Cologne: AI Meets the Classroom – When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
LLMs can aid coding education when used as personal tutors by explaining concepts, but over-reliance on them for solving exercises—especially via copy-and-paste—can impair actual learning and lead students to overestimate their progress.
University of Cologne: AI Meets the Classroom – When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
Summary of Read Full Report
This paper explores the effects of large language models (LLMs) on student learning in coding classes. Three studies were conducted to analyze how LLMs impact learning outcomes, revealing both positive and negative effects.
Using LLMs as personal tutors by asking for explanations was found to improve learning, while relying on them to solve exercises hindered it.
Copy-and-paste functionality was identified as a key factor influencing LLM usage and its subsequent impact. The research also demonstrates that students may overestimate their learning progress when using LLMs, highlighting potential pitfalls.
Finally, results indicated that less skilled students may benefit more from LLMs when learning to code.
Here are five key takeaways regarding the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in learning to code, according to the source:
- LLMs can have both positive and negative effects on learning outcomes. Using LLMs as personal tutors by asking for explanations can improve learning, but relying on them excessively to solve practice exercises can impair learning.
- Copy-and-paste functionality plays a significant role in how LLMs are used. It enables solution-seeking behavior, which can decrease learning.
- Students with less prior domain knowledge may benefit more from LLM access. However, those new to LLMs may be more prone to over-reliance.
- LLMs can increase students’ perceived learning progress, even when controlling for actual progress. This suggests that LLMs may lead to an overestimation of one’s own abilities.
- The effect of LLM usage on learning depends on balancing reliance on LLM-generated solutions and using LLMs as personal tutors, and can vary depending on the specific case.
Related Articles
Gemini 3.1 Pro and the Case for Model-Agnostic Agentic Infrastructure
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro doubled its reasoning benchmarks overnight. Here's why that makes model-agnostic agentic infrastructure more critical than ever.
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro, ChatGPT Ads, and Why Organizations Need to Own Their AI Infrastructure
Google launches Gemini 3.1 Pro with advanced reasoning while OpenAI rolls out ads in ChatGPT. These two moves reveal a growing tension in enterprise AI: who controls the intelligence layer, and whose interests does it serve?
ChatGPT Now Has Ads — And It Should Change How You Think About AI Infrastructure
OpenAI has started showing ads inside ChatGPT responses. This marks a turning point: organizations relying on consumer AI tools are now subject to someone else's monetization strategy. Here's why owning your AI infrastructure matters more than ever.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Just Dropped — Here's What It Means for Organizations Running Their Own AI
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro launched today with 1M-token context, native multimodal reasoning, and agentic tool use. Here's why model releases like this one matter most to organizations that own their AI infrastructure — and why locking into a single provider is the costliest mistake you can make.
See the ibl.ai AI Operating System in Action
Discover how leading universities and organizations are transforming education with the ibl.ai AI Operating System. Explore real-world implementations from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and users from 400+ institutions worldwide.
View Case StudiesGet Started with ibl.ai
Choose the plan that fits your needs and start transforming your educational experience today.