Interested in an on-premise deployment or AI transformation? Call or text 📞 (571) 293-0242
MCP Servers — Connecting Data Across Your Organization
We build Model Context Protocol servers that wrap your existing systems — LMS, SIS, CRM, HRIS, ERP — so AI agents can query and act on real data, under your control.
Agentic Data Modernization — MCP Servers for Your Existing Systems
Your core systems are already in place — LMS, SIS, CRM, HRIS, ERP, advising platforms, degree audit tools. The challenge is turning that foundation into reliable cross-system workflows without re-solving integration from scratch for every new initiative.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) provides a standard interface between applications — including AI agents — and your institutional systems, using small, governed wrappers around your existing APIs. ibl.ai builds these MCP servers so your agents can query, act, and reason across every system you already run. All data stays under your control.
New to MCP? Read our practical Administrator Guide (/service/mcp-servers/guide) for a step-by-step walkthrough of identifying data sources, building servers, deploying a broker, and asking cross-system questions.
The Challenge
Multiple systems, multiple contracts:LMS, SIS, advising, degree audit, and student-success platforms expose different APIs, auth patterns, schemas, and rate limits. Every new integration re-solves the same connectivity problems.
Limited engineering bandwidth:Internal teams prioritize availability, security, identity, and vendor change cycles. Integration work competes with mission-critical operations.
Governance and compliance constraints:FERPA, least-privilege access, data minimization, retention, and stewardship requirements must be enforced consistently across every integration point.
API drift and vendor releases:Endpoints, fields, pagination, and scopes change with every vendor update. Hand-built middleware becomes a maintenance liability.
Lock-in risk:Proprietary integration platforms create long-term dependency through closed workflows and specialized tooling that cannot be exported.
The Solution: MCP-Based Data Architecture
MCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open standard that gives applications — including AI agents — a structured way to connect to external tools, databases, and APIs. Instead of fragile, one-off integrations, each system gets an MCP server: a small, governed wrapper around its existing API that exposes stable tool contracts.
Applications call MCP tools (e.g., get_academic_standing) rather than embedding vendor-specific endpoints. When vendor APIs change, only the MCP server for that system needs updating — every downstream application continues to work without modification.
Key Principles
Stable contracts for applications:Applications and agents call MCP tools rather than embedding vendor-specific endpoints. The tool interface is yours to version and control.
Least-privilege access:Each MCP server uses scoped credentials and enforces per-tool permissions and parameter validation. Deny-by-default tool exposure.
Auditability by design:Every tool call is logged with requester identity, tool name, parameters, timestamp, and outcome. Complete observability without bolting it on after the fact.
Change isolation:Vendor and API changes are handled inside the MCP server wrapper, avoiding downstream breakage across multiple applications and agents.
Open standard, portable implementation:MCP is not proprietary middleware. Your institution owns the code and runs it in its preferred environment. No vendor lock-in at the integration layer.
Why MCP Instead of Traditional Integration
Engineering effort:Traditional iPaaS and custom middleware require large, upfront builds. MCP architecture is incremental — days to weeks per system wrapper.
Maintenance:Traditional integrations ripple changes across flows. With MCP, maintenance is localized to the server for that system.
Security consistency:Traditional approaches fragment security across integrations. MCP provides central policy enforcement with per-tool controls.
Observability:Traditional integrations bolt on observability after the fact. MCP broker and servers are natural choke points with built-in telemetry.
Lock-in risk:Traditional platforms create high lock-in through proprietary tooling. MCP is portable code on an open protocol.
Time to value:Traditional integration programs take months or longer. MCP delivers weeks to first production use case.
Systems We Wrap with MCP
LMS (Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, Open edX, Brightspace):Courses, grades, assignments, engagement data, announcements, enrollment management — all exposed as structured MCP tools.
SIS (Banner, Colleague, PeopleSoft, Workday Student):Enrollment status, academic standing, credits, holds, transcript data — with FERPA-compliant access controls at the tool level.
Advising & Student Success:Alerts, notes, interventions, caseload management — agents can check advising history and route concerns to the right staff.
Degree Audit & Planning:Requirements, progress tracking, what-if planning — agents can answer 'what do I need to graduate?' with real data.
CRM & Enrollment Management (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slate):Contact records, prospect engagement, inquiry routing, enrollment workflows — structured tools for the full admissions pipeline.
HR / ERP (Workday, SAP, Oracle HCM, ADP):Benefits queries, PTO balances, org charts, onboarding workflows — for enterprise and corporate learning deployments.
Identity & Authorization:SSO groups and roles, entitlements, service accounts — the foundation for role-based access control across all MCP servers.
Custom Internal APIs:Any REST or GraphQL API your organization runs. If it has an API, we can wrap it with an MCP server.
Use Cases Enabled
Unified Academic Standing Query:'How is student X doing academically right now?' — One query pulls LMS course progress, SIS enrollment status, and degree audit progress. One answer contract usable by dashboards, advisors, workflows, and AI assistants.
Early Intervention Alerts:Detect missed deadlines, grade drops, and inactivity thresholds across systems. Generate recommended next steps and route to staff queues with full audit trail. Automated and auditable.
Personalized Outbound Notifications:Messages grounded in program goals and requirements (SIS/degree audit), current performance and engagement (LMS), and prior intervention outcomes (advising/success platform).
AI Tutors and Advising Copilots:When authorized via RBAC, agents tailor guidance using performance patterns, incorporate upcoming deadlines and pacing, and align recommendations with degree requirements and advising notes.
Phased Implementation Plan
Phase 0 — Alignment:Production-ready design before touching live systems. Define initial use cases and data boundaries, confirm identity model (SSO/IAM), RBAC requirements, audit logging targets, and hosting pattern.
Phase 1 — Proof of Concept (Sandbox):End-to-end architecture validated without production risk. Synthetic datasets, MCP servers exposing representative tools, broker enforcing policy and caching, demo query returning aggregated response.
Phase 2 — Production Pilot (Real Data, Narrow Scope):One high-value workflow operating under full controls. Wrap 2-3 sources, implement RBAC, audit logging, and rate limiting. Deliver one application workflow. Validate monitoring, alerting, and rollback.
Phase 3 — Expand Coverage:Add systems without rewriting applications. Additional advising, degree audit, communications, and ticketing tools. Refine caching, pagination strategies, and data minimization rules.
Phase 4 — Scale Applications:Multiple teams build on a shared, governed integration layer. Standard MCP templates per system category, self-service onboarding for internal apps and agents, repeatable security reviews focused on MCP tools.
Security and Compliance
FERPA:Data never leaves authorized systems. MCP provides a standardized query interface — it does not replicate or warehouse student data.
RBAC:Role-based access control at every layer. Each MCP server enforces per-tool permissions. Deny-by-default tool exposure.
Audit logging:Complete trail of who queried what, when, with what parameters, and what was returned. Every tool invocation is recorded.
PII minimization:Input validation and output filtering reduce exposure of personally identifiable information to only what each tool requires.
Transport security:Request signing and mutual TLS between broker and servers. OAuth 2.0, API keys, and SAML authentication supported.
SOC 2 compliant:Enterprise-grade security architecture. Option for on-premises deployment so data never leaves your network.
On LLM Token Costs
Token usage for tool routing and structured queries is typically pennies per workflow at institutional volumes. The material costs in integration programs come from engineering time, coordination overhead, and long-tail maintenance. MCP reduces recurring integration labor by standardizing interfaces and isolating change.
Get Started
Architecture Consultation:Free 30-minute session to map your systems and identify MCP server opportunities.
Proof of Concept:We build MCP servers for your highest-value systems with synthetic data to validate the architecture before touching production.
Production Deployment:Full MCP infrastructure across your critical systems — with all source code, deployment artifacts, and documentation owned by your institution.
What our partners say about us
Chris Gabriel | Google
Lorena Barba | George Washington University
Dr. Juana Mendenhall | Morehouse College
Juile Diop | MIT
Adam Tetelman | Nvidia
Jason Dom | American Public University System
Erika Digirolamo | Monroe College
David Flaten | SUNY
David Vise | Modern States Education Alliance
Linda Wood | ARM Institute (U.S. Department of Defense)
Chris Gabriel | Google
Lorena Barba | George Washington University
Dr. Juana Mendenhall | Morehouse College
Juile Diop | MIT
Adam Tetelman | Nvidia
Jason Dom | American Public University System
Erika Digirolamo | Monroe College
David Flaten | SUNY
David Vise | Modern States Education Alliance
Linda Wood | ARM Institute (U.S. Department of Defense)