American Association of Colleges and Universities: Leading Through Disruption – Higher Education Executives Assess AI’s Impacts on Teaching and Learning
The report, based on a survey of 337 higher ed leaders by AAC&U and Elon University, finds that while 91% believe AI can enhance learning, significant challenges remain. Only 2% of leaders feel faculty are AI-ready, with 65% concerned that new grads are underprepared for AI-driven workplaces. Faculty struggles with spotting AI-generated work and resistance to AI adoption, alongside concerns about academic integrity and deep learning, underscore the urgent need for policy updates, curriculum changes, and professional development.
American Association of Colleges and Universities: Leading Through Disruption – Higher Education Executives Assess AI’s Impacts on Teaching and Learning
Summary of https://iblnews.org/ai-will-generate-better-student-learning-outcomes-as-teaching-models-change-says-aacu
This report summarizes a survey conducted by the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) and Elon University's Imagining the Digital Future Center on the impact of generative AI on higher education. The survey of 337 college leaders reveals widespread student use of AI tools, but a significant lack of faculty preparedness and concerns about academic integrity.
While many leaders anticipate positive impacts on learning and research, they also express worries about over-reliance, equity issues, and the need for ethical considerations in AI education.
The report highlights the need for institutional change, including policy updates, faculty development, and curriculum adjustments to effectively integrate AI into teaching and learning. Overall, a cautiously optimistic outlook prevails, with most leaders expecting positive impacts despite significant challenges.
Key findings and takeaways:
- Only 2% of higher ed leaders think most of their faculty are ready to use AI in teaching!
- 65% feel 2024 grads weren't ready for AI-driven workplaces.
- 54% say faculty can't spot AI-generated content. 🕵️♀️, while 59% say cheating has increased!
- Students are using AI much more than faculty.
- Faculty resistance, not students, is seen as the biggest barrier to adopting AI.
- Only 19% of schools have AI majors/minors. 🎓, while 69% have policies about AI use.
- While 91% believe AI enhances learning, 92% worry it undermines deep learning!
Related Articles
Students as Agent Builders: How Role-Based Access (RBAC) Makes It Possible
How ibl.ai’s role-based access control (RBAC) enables students to safely design and build real AI agents—mirroring industry-grade systems—while institutions retain full governance, security, and faculty oversight.
AI Equity as Infrastructure: Why Equitable Access to Institutional AI Must Be Treated as a Campus Utility — Not a Privilege
Why AI must be treated as shared campus infrastructure—closing the equity gap between students who can afford premium tools and those who can’t, and showing how ibl.ai enables affordable, governed AI access for all.
Pilot Fatigue and the Cost of Hesitation: Why Campuses Are Stuck in Endless Proof-of-Concept Cycles
Why higher education’s cautious pilot culture has become a roadblock to innovation—and how usage-based, scalable AI frameworks like ibl.ai’s help institutions escape “demo purgatory” and move confidently to production.
AI Literacy as Institutional Resilience: Equipping Faculty, Staff, and Administrators with Practical AI Fluency
How universities can turn AI literacy into institutional resilience—equipping every stakeholder with practical fluency, transparency, and confidence through explainable, campus-owned AI systems.