How ibl.ai Cuts Cost Without Cutting Capability

Universities want the upside of generative AI—better tutoring, faster content creation, smarter workflows—without burning through their entire innovation budget on per-seat licenses. If that sounds like your life, here’s the simple truth: architecture, not hype, determines your AI total cost of ownership (TCO). ibl.ai’s mentorAI platform is engineered so institutions control the biggest cost drivers—models, hosting, and scale—while keeping quality high and faculty firmly in the loop.

---

The Problem with Per-Seat AI

Do the napkin math:

• ChatGPT Plus at $20/user/month × 5,000 students = $1.2M/year—and that’s just for access, not campus integration.

Those prices climb fast when you try to cover entire cohorts or multiple colleges. Worse, you’re locked into one vendor’s roadmap, rate changes, and data policies.

How ibl.ai Flips the Cost Curve

1) Model freedom = price control

mentorAI is LLM-agnostic. Pick OpenAI, Google Gemini, Anthropic, Llama, or your own model—course by course, use case by use case. That means you can reserve premium models for advanced research seminars and run efficient, lower-cost models for everyday Q&A, cutting your average cost per interaction without sacrificing outcomes.

2) Own the code, run in your cloud

With ibl.ai, institutions can access the full codebase and deploy in their own cloud (or preferred provider). You aren’t paying a perpetual “platform tax” just to access your own data, and you can scale resources up or down based on real usage—not a license sheet.

3) One platform, many departments

The backend is multi-tenant by design, so a single deployment can serve multiple schools, programs, or campuses with strict data isolation and shared infrastructure. Central IT gets efficiency; departments get autonomy.

4) Broad model access without bespoke plumbing

ibl.ai exposes an application layer and APIs over 200+ AI models, so you can swap providers or add new models without rebuilding your app stack—a huge hedge against future price swings.

Affordability Without Compromise

Cost savings mean nothing if the learning suffers. mentorAI was built for higher ed from day one:

• Grounded answers, not guesswork. Instructors upload course materials; the mentor cites them back to students. (Hello, fewer hallucinations and higher trust.)

• Faculty-first controls. Define tone, safety rules, and what the AI can or cannot do; review analytics to see where students struggle.

• Seamless LMS presence. Embed directly in your existing learning environment, so students get help in context—no tab-hopping.

And yes, educators notice the value. As Monroe College’s Erika DiGirolamo puts it: ibl.ai delivers a “top-notch, reliable platform” with “full ownership”—“far more affordable than competitors.” That’s the voice that matters.

What This Looks Like in Practice

• Right-size the model to the task. Everyday tutoring? Use a cost-efficient model. Capstone research? Switch to a top-tier model—only when needed. (One platform, many choices.)

• Scale once, serve many. A multi-tenant deployment supports multiple colleges and programs, centralizing security and governance while spreading infrastructure costs.

• Avoid vendor whiplash. Because you own the code and can host in your cloud, you’re shielded from sudden pricing shifts or feature deprecations.

The Takeaway

If your AI strategy still depends on buying thousands of individual chatbot seats, you’re paying for the wrong thing. Affordability comes from control—control over models, hosting, and integration. That’s exactly what ibl.ai is built to provide, so you can bring powerful AI to every student and instructor without lighting your budget on fire.