No Vendor Lock-In, Full Code & Data Ownership with ibl.ai
Own your AI application layer. Ship the whole stack, keep code and data in your perimeter, run multi-tenant deployments, choose your LLMs, and integrate via LTI—no vendor lock-in.
When campus leaders ask what it really takes to use AI at scale, the conversation inevitably lands on control. Not just feature control, but control over where the software runs, how it evolves, and who ultimately owns the code and the data. Closed, per-seat AI products make a lot of decisions for you—pricing, roadmaps, even what you’re allowed to integrate. That’s convenient until it isn’t. Our approach is different: we ship the whole stack so universities can run the platform on their own terms. The institution decides the cloud, the model mix, the integrations, and the governance. If priorities change next semester (or next week), your platform doesn’t need to.
What “Owning It” Looks Like in Practice
Owning the stack isn’t a slogan; it’s a deployment stance. We deliver the full application codebase, ready to run in your environment, with support for cloud options like AWS ECS and easy fit in GCP, AWS, Azure, or Oracle environments. Your data stays inside your compliance perimeter; logging and guardrails align to your policies. And if we part ways, your system keeps running—no claw-backs, no lock-outs. It’s also multi-tenant by design. One deployment can safely serve multiple schools or programs—Continuing Ed, the College of Arts & Sciences, professional certificates—each isolated as its own tenant. That lets IT standardize infrastructure while giving local admins the autonomy to manage users, roles, content sources, and policy settings without crossing any data boundaries.The Model Layer: Choice Without Churn
Higher ed shouldn’t be forced into a single LLM. We abstract over leading providers (e.g., OpenAI, Google, Anthropic) so teams can choose a model per assistant or workflow and swap later as needs evolve—without rewriting the application layer. Because SDKs and capabilities differ, some advanced features are model-specific; we surface those trade-offs clearly in templates and settings so faculty aren’t surprised mid-course. The result is practical flexibility: keep the UX and governance stable while the model mix improves underneath.Integrations on Your Terms
Faculty expect AI to live where they teach. We embed natively via LTI 1.3 in any LMS, including Canvas, Blackboard, and Brightspace. We also provide standalone web and mobile apps for departments that want to move fast. For content grounding (RAG), instructors can drag-and-drop materials, and IT can approve API-based connectors to LMS content libraries or other sources. Permissions are enforced at the course or tenant level, so context stays appropriate and auditable.Defaults That Work, Controls When You Want Them
The fastest way to lose faculty is to hand them a blank configuration screen. Out of the box, everything “just works”—sensible defaults, clear citations, safety rails. When instructors want more say, they can tune prompt and pedagogy settings to steer tone, scope, and behavior. Institution-level guardrails sit above any vendor model, so responses remain aligned with your academic standards and policies.Why This Matters to Universities
Ownership changes the risk calculus. With your own application layer, you can respond to pricing changes, vendor shifts, and new compliance requirements without ripping and replacing tools mid-semester. IT gets a modern, containerized deployment that matches existing cloud and security practices. Faculty get dependable interfaces they can shape to their courses. And budgets stretch further because you’re paying for usage (via APIs), not seats in a black-box product. In short, you gain:- Governance & compliance that travel with you across departments, models, and semesters.
- Academic continuity when a provider changes terms or features.
- Strategic flexibility to adopt new models and integrations without retraining your campus.
- IT alignment through containerized deployments and policy-driven tenants.
In Conclusion
If you want AI that reflects your curriculum, your governance, and your infrastructure, let’s talk. We’ll show how shipping the whole stack—multi-tenant and model-agnostic—keeps your campus in control today and adaptable tomorrow. Visit ibl.ai/contact to get started.Related Articles
How ibl.ai Makes Top-Tier LLMs Affordable for Every Student
This article makes the case for democratizing AI in higher education by shifting from expensive per-seat licenses to ibl.ai’s mentorAI—a model-agnostic, pay-as-you-go platform that universities can host in their own cloud with full code and data ownership. It details how campuses cut costs (up to 85% vs. ChatGPT in a pilot), maintain academic rigor via RAG-grounded, instructor-approved content, and scale equity through a multi-tenant deployment that serves every department. The takeaway: top-tier LLM experiences can be affordable, trustworthy, and accessible to every student.
ibl.ai + Morehouse College: MORAL AI (Morehouse Outreach for Responsible AI in Learning)
ibl.ai and Morehouse College have partnered to launch MORAL AI—a pioneering, values-driven initiative empowering HBCU faculty to design responsible, transparent, and institution-controlled AI mentors that reflect their pedagogical goals, protect privacy, and ensure equitable access across liberal arts education.
ibl.ai and Morehouse College: 2025 AI Initiative
Morehouse College and ibl.ai have launched the 2025 Artificial Intelligence – Pedagogical Innovative Leaders of Technology Fellows Program, a pioneering initiative that embeds AI Mentors and Avatars into liberal arts education—advancing human-centered, affordable, and faculty-driven AI innovation across the HBCU landscape.
mentorAI at GWU for Student Success and Faculty Support: 85% Cheaper than ChatGPT and 75% Cheaper than Microsoft Copilot
At George Washington University, Professor Lorena A. Barba and ibl.ai deployed a customizable, course-grounded AI mentor—an 85% cheaper, faculty-led alternative to ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot—empowering educators with full control, transparency, and measurable impact on student success.