George Washington University Law School: Artificial Intelligence and Privacy
Daniel J. Solove’s piece argues that current privacy laws—focused mainly on individual control—are inadequate for addressing the systemic harms posed by AI, and calls for a regulatory framework based on harm analysis and structural reforms.
George Washington University Law School: Artificial Intelligence and Privacy
Summary of https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4713111
This piece by Daniel J. Solove examines the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and privacy. Solove argues that while AI exacerbates existing privacy issues, current privacy laws are insufficient, focusing too heavily on individual control rather than addressing systemic harms and risks.
The article analyzes AI's impact on data collection, generation, decision-making, and data analysis, highlighting the limitations of existing legal frameworks.
Finally, Solove proposes a regulatory roadmap emphasizing harm-based analysis and structural reforms to address AI's privacy challenges.
Related Articles
Students as Agent Builders: How Role-Based Access (RBAC) Makes It Possible
How ibl.ai’s role-based access control (RBAC) enables students to safely design and build real AI agents—mirroring industry-grade systems—while institutions retain full governance, security, and faculty oversight.
AI Equity as Infrastructure: Why Equitable Access to Institutional AI Must Be Treated as a Campus Utility — Not a Privilege
Why AI must be treated as shared campus infrastructure—closing the equity gap between students who can afford premium tools and those who can’t, and showing how ibl.ai enables affordable, governed AI access for all.
Pilot Fatigue and the Cost of Hesitation: Why Campuses Are Stuck in Endless Proof-of-Concept Cycles
Why higher education’s cautious pilot culture has become a roadblock to innovation—and how usage-based, scalable AI frameworks like ibl.ai’s help institutions escape “demo purgatory” and move confidently to production.
AI Literacy as Institutional Resilience: Equipping Faculty, Staff, and Administrators with Practical AI Fluency
How universities can turn AI literacy into institutional resilience—equipping every stakeholder with practical fluency, transparency, and confidence through explainable, campus-owned AI systems.