George Washington University Law School: Artificial Intelligence and Privacy
Daniel J. Solove’s piece argues that current privacy laws—focused mainly on individual control—are inadequate for addressing the systemic harms posed by AI, and calls for a regulatory framework based on harm analysis and structural reforms.
George Washington University Law School: Artificial Intelligence and Privacy
Summary of Read Full Report
This piece by Daniel J. Solove examines the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and privacy. Solove argues that while AI exacerbates existing privacy issues, current privacy laws are insufficient, focusing too heavily on individual control rather than addressing systemic harms and risks.
The article analyzes AI's impact on data collection, generation, decision-making, and data analysis, highlighting the limitations of existing legal frameworks.
Finally, Solove proposes a regulatory roadmap emphasizing harm-based analysis and structural reforms to address AI's privacy challenges.
Related Articles
Gemini 3.1 Pro and the Case for Model-Agnostic Agentic Infrastructure
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro doubled its reasoning benchmarks overnight. Here's why that makes model-agnostic agentic infrastructure more critical than ever.
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro, ChatGPT Ads, and Why Organizations Need to Own Their AI Infrastructure
Google launches Gemini 3.1 Pro with advanced reasoning while OpenAI rolls out ads in ChatGPT. These two moves reveal a growing tension in enterprise AI: who controls the intelligence layer, and whose interests does it serve?
ChatGPT Now Has Ads — And It Should Change How You Think About AI Infrastructure
OpenAI has started showing ads inside ChatGPT responses. This marks a turning point: organizations relying on consumer AI tools are now subject to someone else's monetization strategy. Here's why owning your AI infrastructure matters more than ever.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Just Dropped — Here's What It Means for Organizations Running Their Own AI
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro launched today with 1M-token context, native multimodal reasoning, and agentic tool use. Here's why model releases like this one matter most to organizations that own their AI infrastructure — and why locking into a single provider is the costliest mistake you can make.
See the ibl.ai AI Operating System in Action
Discover how leading universities and organizations are transforming education with the ibl.ai AI Operating System. Explore real-world implementations from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and users from 400+ institutions worldwide.
View Case StudiesGet Started with ibl.ai
Choose the plan that fits your needs and start transforming your educational experience today.