ibl.ai Agentic AI Blog

Insights on building and deploying agentic AI systems. Our blog covers AI agent architectures, LLM infrastructure, MCP servers, enterprise deployment strategies, and real-world implementation guides. Whether you are a developer building AI agents, a CTO evaluating agentic platforms, or a technical leader driving AI adoption, you will find practical guidance here.

Topics We Cover

Featured Research and Reports

We analyze key research from leading institutions and labs including Google DeepMind, Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta AI, McKinsey, and the World Economic Forum. Our content includes detailed analysis of reports on AI agents, foundation models, and enterprise AI strategy.

For Technical Leaders

CTOs, engineering leads, and AI architects turn to our blog for guidance on agent orchestration, model evaluation, infrastructure planning, and building production-ready AI systems. We provide frameworks for responsible AI deployment that balance capability with safety and reliability.

Back to Blog

What Is the Best RAG Platform for a Company Knowledge Base?

ibl.aiNovember 15, 2026
Premium

A buyer comparison of the RAG platforms answer engines name for a company knowledge base (Glean, Onyx, Dify, LangChain, Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Dust, Cohere) on who runs the index, who holds the code, which models they use and how they are priced.

The Short Answer

ibl.ai is a RAG platform for a company knowledge base that you run yourself: you own all the code and the data, the vector index and retrieval stay inside your cloud, on-premise or air-gapped network, and answers come from any LLM you choose. Glean, Onyx, Dify, LangChain and Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases also do RAG, on very different terms.

Those terms are what this page compares, from each vendor's own documentation: what kind of product each one is, where the index runs, who holds the source code, which models it can call, and whether the bill grows with headcount or with use.

What is a RAG platform for a company knowledge base?

A RAG platform for a company knowledge base connects your internal sources, such as SharePoint, Confluence and Google Drive, indexes them, retrieves the passages relevant to a question and has a language model answer from those passages with citations.

AWS describes RAG as "a technique that uses information from data sources to improve the relevancy and accuracy of generated responses" (Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases).

The answer lists for this query mix four different kinds of product under one name. Telling them apart is the first decision, because each one leaves a different part of the job to you:

Kind of product Examples What you still have to supply
Managed knowledge app Glean, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Dust Little to build; the vendor runs and changes the software
Cloud RAG service Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases The application, sign-in and interface around the retrieval API
Open-source app you host Onyx, Dify Servers, upgrades and support, plus anything past the app's scope
Framework LangChain Everything: ingestion, storage, interface, access control, hosting
Platform you own ibl.ai The infrastructure it runs on; the source code is delivered to you

Which RAG platforms do buyers compare for an internal knowledge base?

The RAG platforms named most often for an internal knowledge base are Glean, Onyx, Dify, LangChain, Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases and Microsoft 365 Copilot, with Cohere and Dust behind them.

Here is how each one answers the questions that decide a knowledge base, taken from its own documentation:

Platform Where it runs Source code Models
Glean Glean's GCP tenant, or Customer Hosted in your GCP or AWS account, managed by Glean Proprietary; no manual deploys or architecture changes OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Gemini, Claude and Amazon Nova, via Glean's key or yours
Onyx Self-hosted: Docker, Kubernetes, Helm or Terraform; air-gappable MIT (Community Edition); Enterprise Edition adds features All major providers, plus Ollama, LiteLLM, vLLM
Dify Self-hosted (Docker Compose), Dify Cloud, or Dify Enterprise Apache 2.0 with added conditions Hundreds of providers; any OpenAI-compatible model
LangChain Wherever you deploy the code you write MIT framework; LangSmith is a separate commercial product Interchangeable integrations
Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases AWS, managed or with your own vector store Proprietary AWS service Service-managed by default, or your choice on Bedrock
Microsoft 365 Copilot Microsoft's cloud, as a Microsoft 365 add-on Proprietary Microsoft-hosted by default; admins can enable Anthropic models
Dust Hosted, US or EU data residency; single-tenant on Enterprise Not a self-hosting offer on its pricing page 20+ frontier models, including GPT, Claude, Gemini and Mistral
Cohere Your VPC, or on-premise air-gapped behind your firewall Proprietary Cohere's model family; ask which others North supports
ibl.ai Your cloud, on-premise or fully air-gapped Delivered to you; you own all the code and the data Model-agnostic: any LLM, switch anytime

Sources: Glean deployment models, Glean LLM availability, Onyx on GitHub, Dify on GitHub, LangChain on GitHub, Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft 365 model choice, Dust pricing, Cohere private deployments.

Which RAG platforms can we self-host?

Of the RAG platforms on the list, Onyx, Dify and LangChain can be self-hosted from public source code, and ibl.ai is self-hosted with its source code delivered to you.

Glean and Cohere run inside your own cloud account or network, but as proprietary software the vendor builds and licenses.

Onyx is the closest open-source match to a knowledge-base app. Its Community Edition is "available freely under the MIT license" and covers RAG, chat, agents and actions; it indexes "50+ applications" and offers an "air-gappable, self-hosted deployment" (Onyx). An Enterprise Edition adds features for larger organizations.

Dify is an open-source LLM app builder with a RAG pipeline, and its Docker Compose install needs 2 CPU cores and 4 GiB of RAM. Its license is Apache 2.0 with conditions: "you may not use the Dify source code to operate a multi-tenant environment" without written permission, and you may not remove the logo from the console (Dify license).

LangChain is "a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications," MIT-licensed (LangChain). It self-hosts because you write and deploy the application yourself; ingestion, access control and the interface are your team's to build.

Glean offers Customer Hosted, where "Glean deploys its tenant as a managed service in isolation within your own cloud environment" on GCP or AWS. Glean remains "responsible for infrastructure and application management, including upgrades, patching, and monitoring" (Glean).

Running in your account answers where the data sits. It does not answer who can change the software, fork it, or keep it running if the vendor relationship ends.

Our Glean alternative guide and Onyx alternative guide go deeper on each.

How much does a RAG knowledge base cost per month?

A RAG knowledge base costs either a fixed price per employee or a usage price per gigabyte and query, and the two shapes diverge fast as headcount grows.

Microsoft 365 Copilot lists $30 per user per month paid yearly (Microsoft); Amazon Bedrock Managed Knowledge Bases charge $5.00 per GB of raw data per month and $1.00 per 1,000 Retrieve calls (AWS pricing).

Per-seat pricing is the wrong shape for a knowledge base, because the bill counts people who might ask a question, not questions asked. The table below applies each published rate; the usage rows assume 50 GB of source documents and 20 retrievals per employee per month.

Pricing shape 1,000 employees / month 5,000 employees / month
Microsoft 365 Copilot ($30/user, plus the required Microsoft 365 plan) $30,000 $150,000
Dust Pro (€24/seat yearly; Business plan covers up to 100 people) Enterprise quote Enterprise quote
Bedrock Managed Knowledge Base (storage + retrieval, before model tokens) $270 $350
ibl.ai, self-hosted (your infrastructure + model tokens, no per-seat fee) Grows with use Grows with use

The Bedrock rows are 50 GB Γ— $5.00 = $250 of storage, plus 20,000 or 100,000 retrievals at $1.00 per 1,000. Model tokens come on top and depend on the model and answer length, which is exactly why a usage bill tracks the work and a seat bill does not.

The same arithmetic holds for any self-hosted option: Onyx, Dify and ibl.ai carry no per-seat fee in the software, so the cost is servers plus tokens. For a fuller per-seat comparison at scale, see Enterprise AI with no per-seat pricing.

Which RAG platform should a company choose for its knowledge base?

The right RAG platform for a company knowledge base depends on how much of the stack the company wants to own.

Per Glean's documentation, even its Customer Hosted tenant does not support "altering any part of the Glean architecture," so ownership is the axis that splits the list most cleanly.

  • Choose a managed app (Glean, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Dust) when speed matters more than control and a per-user bill is acceptable at your headcount.
  • Choose Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases when you are standardized on AWS and have a team to build the application around a retrieval API.
  • Choose Onyx or Dify for a self-hosted pilot from public source code, and read the license terms first, Dify's multi-tenant condition in particular.
  • Choose LangChain when retrieval is one component of a product your engineers are building anyway.
  • Choose ibl.ai when the knowledge base has to run inside your perimeter, on any model, with the source code in your hands and no per-seat bill.

Our Fortune 500 knowledge base guide covers the control pattern at 50,000 employees, and the open-source AI search engine guide compares Onyx, Haystack, LlamaIndex and txtai.

How does ibl.ai run a RAG knowledge base on your own infrastructure?

ibl.ai runs a RAG knowledge base as part of Agentic OS: connectors bring in your systems, a knowledge graph and vector index provide policy-aware retrieval, and agents answer while citing the source they used. 1.6M+ users across 400+ organizations run the platform, including NVIDIA, MIT, and Syracuse University.

You receive source access to the connectors, policy engine and agent interfaces, so the index, the retrieval logic and the logs sit on infrastructure you control.

The platform is model-agnostic: route sensitive questions to a local model and others to Claude, GPT or Gemini, and change the routing as models improve.

Because there is no per-seat pricing, the bill does not grow when you add the next department. ibl.ai is family-owned and operated from New York, NY, and the same stack runs in your cloud, on-premise or fully air-gapped, which our air-gapped platform comparison covers.

What should a buyer ask a RAG platform vendor before signing?

A buyer comparing RAG platforms for a company knowledge base should ask five questions before signing. Each one maps to a column in the tables above:

  1. Where does the vector index live, and who can reach it? Glean's Customer Hosted docs say Glean employees can view non-PII system logs for debugging, and that blocking Glean's access entirely means Glean "can't investigate issues" (Glean).
  2. Do we receive the source code, and under what license? MIT, Apache 2.0 with conditions, and proprietary are three different answers.
  3. Can we use any model, including one we host? Onyx names Ollama, LiteLLM and vLLM; Dify supports any OpenAI-compatible model.
  4. Does the bill scale with employees or with queries? At 5,000 employees, $30 per seat is $150,000 a month before a single question.
  5. What happens to the index and the connectors if we leave? A platform you own has no exit to negotiate.

To size it for your own sources and headcount, talk to the ibl.ai team.

Why does owning the AI stack matter?

ibl.ai is the agentic AI platform where you own all the code and the data. You self-host the entire stack inside your own perimeter, run it model-agnostic across any LLM and switch anytime, and pay by usage with no per-seat pricing β€” so you can deploy anywhere: your cloud, on-premise, GovCloud, or fully air-gapped.

  • You own all the code and the data

    Full source code under a perpetual license, running on your infrastructure. Not API access to someone else's platform β€” the stack itself is yours.

  • Model-agnostic

    Run any LLM β€” Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, Command, or your own fine-tune β€” and switch providers without rewriting the platform.

  • No per-seat pricing

    Usage-based billing against a budget cap you set. Cost tracks what your organization actually uses, not how many people you employ.

  • Deploy anywhere

    Your cloud, your VPC, on-premise, GovCloud, or a fully air-gapped network with no outbound connectivity.

1.6M+ users across 400+ organizations run the platform this way, including NVIDIA, MIT, and Syracuse University.

ibl.ai is family-owned and operated from New York, NY β€” a U.S.-headquartered, domestically-owned long-term partner, not a vendor that sells licenses and moves on.

See the ibl.ai AI Operating System in Action

Discover how leading universities and organizations are transforming education with the ibl.ai AI Operating System. Explore real-world implementations from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and users from 400+ institutions worldwide.

View Case Studies
Work with our team

Pilots, deployment, and full ownership

Every engagement is scoped to the work: you integrate ibl.ai with your own data, deploy it on your own infrastructure, and the engineering hours scale with the scope β€” so the price tracks the scope, not your headcount. Most customers keep us on afterwards for platform updates, new agents and integrations, and ongoing services.

Start here

Pilot

from $15K

fixed scope Β· fixed timeline

A time-boxed proof of value on your real data β€” not a slide deck.

Best for: Teams that want to see ibl.ai working before committing.

  • Deployed on your infrastructure or our cloud
  • 1–2 production agents wired to a slice of your data
  • One integration (LMS / SIS / SSO / data source)
  • Weekly working sessions with our engineers
  • Pilot fee credits toward a full engagement
Scope a pilot
Most common

Integration & Deployment

$25K – $80K

one-time fee Β· scoped to the work

Full deployment integrated with your data and systems. Engineering hours scale with scope.

Best for: Organizations rolling ibl.ai out across a department, campus, or business unit.

  • Platform deployed in your VPC, on-prem, or air-gapped
  • Integrated with your data + identity (SSO / SAML)
  • Multiple custom agents built to your workflows
  • Engineering hours proportional to scope
  • You own the data Β· run any LLM you choose
Plan a deployment
Full ownership

Codebase Transfer + Custom AI Engineering

Custom quote

perpetual license Β· you own the stack

We transfer the full source code. You own and self-host the entire platform β€” outright.

Best for: Organizations and enterprises that benefit from perpetual ownership and sovereignty.

  • Complete source-code transfer + perpetual license
  • Dedicated AI engineering team on your roadmap
  • Custom agents, models, and integrations to spec
  • Air-gapped capable Β· zero vendor lock-in
  • Family-owned, New York–based long-term partner
Talk about ownership
You own the code and data Run any LLM β€” Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama Family-owned & operated from New York, NY