Back to Blog

Building a Vertical AI Agent for Grants and Contracts: Accelerating Agreement Without Sacrificing Judgment

Higher EducationDecember 26, 2025
Premium

Research and institutional contracts require careful review but often create bottlenecks. A purpose-built AI agent can accelerate processing while ensuring human judgment on matters that require it.

The Contracts Challenge

Universities manage thousands of agreements annually:

  • Research grants and contracts
  • Vendor and service agreements
  • Affiliation and partnership agreements
  • Clinical trial agreements
  • Data use agreements
  • Licensing and IP agreements
  • Subcontracts and subawards

Each agreement requires review for institutional interests, compliance, and risk. This review takes time—time that researchers and partners often find frustrating.


What a Contracts Agent Does

A vertical AI agent for grants and contracts accelerates routine processing while ensuring human review for complex provisions.

Intake and Triage

When agreements arrive:

Risk Assessment: Analyze incoming documents for risk level based on type, counterparty, and content.

Priority Routing: Route high-risk or complex agreements to senior reviewers; queue standard agreements appropriately.

Missing Element Detection: Identify incomplete submissions and request necessary information.

Counterparty Intelligence: Surface relevant history and context about the other party.

Review Support

During contract review:

Clause Identification: Automatically identify and extract key provisions—IP, liability, termination, data rights.

Deviation Flagging: Compare against institutional templates and flag non-standard provisions.

Issue Spotting: Identify provisions that historically require negotiation or present risk.

Precedent Search: Find how similar provisions were handled in past agreements.

Negotiation Support

For agreement negotiation:

Alternative Language: Suggest institution-preferred language for problematic clauses.

Rationale Generation: Draft explanations of institutional position on negotiating points.

Approval Preparation: Compile documentation for agreements requiring elevated approval.

Lifecycle Management

After execution:

Obligation Tracking: Monitor dates and deliverables required under agreements.

Renewal Management: Alert to approaching renewal dates or termination windows.

Amendment Processing: Track and process changes to existing agreements.


Memory Architecture

Contracts agents require comprehensive legal and institutional knowledge:

Clause Library Memory

Standard and acceptable clause language for common provisions—the building blocks of institutional agreements.

Policy Memory

Institutional policies governing agreements, including approval authorities and required provisions.

Precedent Memory

How similar situations have been handled historically—the accumulated wisdom of past negotiations.

Counterparty Memory

History with specific sponsors, vendors, and partners—context that informs negotiations.

Platform Integrations

Contracts management spans multiple systems:

Contract Management System

The system of record for agreements. The agent reads documents and updates status. For research agreements, integration with pre- and post-award systems.

Document Management

Storage and retrieval of agreement documents and related materials.

Procurement

For vendor agreements, coordination with procurement processes.

Legal/Compliance

Routing and tracking for legal review when required.

Attorney and Administrator Experience

For contracts professionals:

Accelerated Processing: Routine agreements move faster with less manual effort.

Risk Focus: Attention goes to agreements that actually require it.

Complete Information: Reviewers receive organized information without chasing documents.

Institutional Memory: Past decisions are findable and informative.


Researcher and Partner Experience

For those needing agreements:

Faster Turnaround: Routine agreements complete more quickly.

Visibility: Clear status on where agreements stand.

Guidance: Understanding of what's needed and typical timelines.

Responsiveness: Questions answered without waiting for busy staff.


Building on the Right Foundation

Contract content is sensitive and consequential. The platform foundation matters.

Data Sovereignty

Contract terms and negotiations are confidential. Keep them under institutional control.

Professional Judgment

The agent supports but never replaces professional judgment on legal and compliance matters.

Audit Trail

Complete documentation of review and decision processes.

Code Ownership

Institutional clause libraries and review logic are institutional assets.

The Opportunity

Contract bottlenecks delay research, frustrate partners, and consume staff time. AI agents can accelerate processing while maintaining the oversight that protects institutional interests.


*Universities exploring contracts AI should prioritize platforms that offer complete confidentiality, support for professional judgment, and implementation partnerships that understand research administration. The goal is speed without sacrificing the review that protects institutional interests.*