Developer Tools
MCP servers, CLIs, SDKs, APIs, and open source tooling for building on agentic AI platforms.
Building on agentic AI platforms requires the right developer tools—from MCP servers and CLIs to SDKs, APIs, and integration frameworks. Explore open source tooling, integration guides, and developer resources for building, extending, and connecting AI-powered applications.
770 articles in this category
Google: Towards an AI Co-Scientist
The AI co-scientist is a multi-agent system that accelerates biomedical research by generating, debating, and refining hypotheses through iterative improvements and expert feedback, with its capabilities validated in drug repurposing, target discovery, and antimicrobial resistance.
OpenAI: Building an AI-Ready Workforce – A Look at College Student ChatGPT Adoption in the US
OpenAI's report finds that many US college students are self-learning AI skills, leading to uneven adoption across states, and emphasizes the urgent need for clear institutional and nationwide AI education policies to build an AI-ready workforce.
MIT: The AI Agent Index
The MIT AI Agent Index is a public database that catalogs agentic AI systems—tools capable of planning and executing tasks with minimal human oversight—by detailing their technical components, applications, and risk management practices. It reveals that most systems are developed in the USA, mainly by companies in software engineering, and while many projects offer open code and documentation, information on safety policies and external evaluations remains limited.
OWASP: LLM Applications Cybersecurity and Governance Checklist
The document outlines a cybersecurity checklist for organizations using large language models (LLMs). It emphasizes balancing the benefits and risks of LLMs, incorporating security measures into existing practices, providing specialized AI security training, and implementing continuous testing and validation to ensure ethical deployment and robust defenses against threats.
ETS: 2025 Human Progress Report
The report reveals a global shift toward skills-based credentials—particularly AI literacy and continuous learning—as critical for advancing education and career growth, while highlighting both rising progress and ongoing concerns about tech obsolescence, especially among Gen Z.
University of California Irvine: What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Know
The study reveals that users tend to overestimate large language models' accuracy due to discrepancies between the models' internal confidence and the users' interpretation, with longer explanations and specific uncertainty language boosting user confidence regardless of actual accuracy. Tailoring LLM responses to better reflect internal uncertainty can help bridge this calibration gap, improving trustworthiness in AI-assisted decisions.
Stanford University: The Labor Market Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Stanford's research finds that around 30% of workers have used Generative AI at work, with particularly high adoption among younger, educated, and higher-income individuals in customer service, marketing, and IT; users experience significant productivity gains, often reducing task times by two-thirds, indicating that Generative AI can both replace and enhance various forms of labor.
Hugging Face: Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not Be Developed
The paper argues that fully autonomous AI agents, which operate without human oversight, pose serious risks to safety, security, and privacy. It recommends favoring semi-autonomous systems with maintained human control to balance potential benefits like efficiency and assistance against vulnerabilities in accuracy, consistency, and overall risk.
University of Cologne: AI Meets the Classroom – When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
LLMs can aid coding education when used as personal tutors by explaining concepts, but over-reliance on them for solving exercises—especially via copy-and-paste—can impair actual learning and lead students to overestimate their progress.
MIT Sloan: AI Detectors Don't Work – Here's What to Do Instead
AI detection tools are unreliable; instead, educators should set clear AI use guidelines, foster open discussions, and design engaging, inclusive assignments to promote genuine learning.
Anthropic: Which Economic Tasks Are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations
The study analyzes four million Claude.ai conversations mapped to US occupational tasks, revealing that AI is mainly used to augment specific tasks—especially in software development, writing, and other cognitive roles—rather than to replace entire jobs. It finds that mid-to-high wage occupations are using AI significantly, with different models specializing in distinct tasks, highlighting a nuanced, task-specific impact of AI on the economy.
University of Cambridge: Imagine While Reasoning in Space – Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought
MVoT is a novel multimodal reasoning approach that integrates visualizations with textual explanations to enhance complex spatial reasoning in large language models. It outperforms traditional chain-of-thought methods by offering improved interpretability, robust performance in complex environments, and enhanced image quality through token discrepancy loss, and it can complement existing models like GPT-4o.
University of Oxford: Who Should Develop Which AI Evaluations?
The memo proposes a framework for assigning AI evaluation development to various actors—government, contractors, third-party organizations, and AI companies—by using four approaches and nine criteria that balance risk, method requirements, and conflicts of interest, while advocating for a market-based ecosystem to support high-quality evaluations.
University of Texas at Dallas: Human-in-the-Loop or AI-in-the-Loop? Automate or Collaborate?
The discussion contrasts Human-in-the-Loop (HIL) systems, where AI leads and humans assist, with AI-in-the-Loop (AI2L) systems that place humans in control with the AI serving as support. The summary highlights the need for a shift toward human-centric evaluations emphasizing interpretability, fairness, and trust, and argues that AI2L is better suited for complex tasks requiring human expertise.
AI Action Summit: The International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI
The report examines the rapid progress and associated risks of advanced AI, highlighting technical challenges, energy demands, cybersecurity threats, potential misuse, and systemic issues. It stresses the need for responsible development, inclusive risk management, and refined policy-making to balance AI’s benefits with its inherent dangers.
Carnegie Mellon University: Two Types of AI Existential Risk – Decisive and Accumulative
The content outlines two hypotheses on AI existential risk: one where a single catastrophic event from superintelligent AI causes collapse (decisive risk), and another where multiple smaller disruptions gradually erode societal resilience until a tipping point is reached (accumulative risk). It presents a "MISTER" scenario demonstrating how various AI-related threats interconnect and calls for a holistic, integrated approach to AI risk governance that combines ethical, social, and existential considerations.
U.S. Copyright Office: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
The report explains that only works with enough human creative input are eligible for copyright protection. While AI-generated content lacks sufficient human authorship, using AI as a tool or modifying its output can be copyrighted if human expression is evident. The office maintains that existing copyright law is adequate for addressing these issues, emphasizing the central role of human creativity.
European Commission: AI Act Article 5 – Prohibited Practices
The guidelines outline prohibited AI practices under the EU AI Act, including harmful manipulation and deceptive techniques, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, unauthorized biometric and emotion recognition applications, and real-time biometric identification restrictions. They emphasize transparency, legal safeguards, and a balance between innovation and fundamental rights protection, while also noting the interplay with other EU laws.
Centre for Future Generations: CERN for AI – The EU's Seat at the Table
The report proposes the creation of a centralized "CERN for AI" in Europe, backed by €30-35 billion over three years, to foster innovation in advanced, trustworthy AI, bolster economic competitiveness, and enhance strategic autonomy through enhanced public-private collaboration and robust infrastructure.
University of Memphis: Generative AI in Education – From AutoTutor to the Socratic Playground
The research paper explores how generative AI and large language models can transform education through advanced tutoring systems like the Socratic Playground, emphasizing a pedagogy-first approach, human oversight, and adaptable, interactive learning methods that enhance critical thinking and understanding.
Digital Education Council: Global AI Meets Academia Faculty Survey 2025
The survey shows that while many faculty see AI as an opportunity and are beginning to integrate it into teaching, they remain cautious due to concerns over student reliance, unclear institutional guidelines, and a lack of adequate AI literacy resources.
New York City: 2025 Artificial Intelligence Advantage – Driving Economic Growth and Technological Transformation
NYC’s 2025 AI report highlights the city’s robust talent pool, venture capital investment, and vibrant startup ecosystem as key drivers in its emerging AI landscape. It also addresses challenges in responsible AI development, workforce transitions, and regulation, while proposing initiatives to promote inclusive, innovative growth in the field.
Northeastern University: Foundations of Large Language Models
Summary: The content explores foundational methods and advanced techniques in large language model development, including pre-training, generative architectures like Transformers, scaling strategies, alignment through reinforcement learning and instruction fine-tuning, and various prompting methods.
Princeton University: Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents
CoALA is a framework that repurposes cognitive architecture concepts from symbolic AI to enhance large language models, aiming to improve reasoning, grounding, learning, and decision-making in language agents.