Blog
Insights on agentic AI, from agent architectures and LLM infrastructure to enterprise deployment and developer tooling. Our team shares practical guides on building AI agents, optimizing model pipelines, and scaling AI systems in production.
Written for CTOs, developers, AI engineers, and technical leaders who are building or deploying agentic AI. Each article includes actionable takeaways grounded in real-world implementation.
Our editorial team publishes new content weekly, drawing on deployment data from 400+ organizations and 1.6M+ users. Every piece is reviewed by practitioners with hands-on experience building AI platforms.
Explore Topics
Building, deploying, and managing autonomous AI agents for workflow automation, customer support, internal operations, and more.
LLM InfrastructureModel selection, hosting, fine-tuning, cost optimization, and scaling LLM-powered systems in production.
Enterprise AIStrategies for deploying AI at scale across organizations, including governance, compliance, and change management.
Developer ToolsMCP servers, CLIs, SDKs, APIs, and open source tooling for building on agentic AI platforms.
IndustryAI applications across education, healthcare, finance, government, and other verticals.
ConferencesTranscripts and key takeaways from major education and AI conferences including ASU+GSV Summit.
Showing 817-840 of 922 posts
Claude + ibl.ai: A Blueprint for AI-Native Universities
Anthropic’s new Claude for Education supplies the guarded, Socratic chat front end, while ibl.ai’s share-the-code ibl.ai delivers the back-office muscle—LLM-agnostic orchestration, SSO/LTI, audit logs, and faculty overrides—inside a university-owned cloud. Together they ground Claude in syllabus files, blend models, monitor costs, and swap engines at will, eliminating lock-in.
How ibl.ai Integrates with Meta
ibl.ai treats open-weight Llama 3 as a plug-in backend, so schools can self-host the 8B/70B checkpoints or point to 405B cloud endpoints on Bedrock, Azure, or Vertex with one URL swap. LlamaGuard plus ibl.ai filters keep chats compliant, while open weights let faculty fine-tune models to campus style and run them locally to avoid usage fees.
How ibl.ai Integrates with Google Gemini: Technical Capabilities and Value for Higher Education
ibl.ai’s Gemini guide shows campuses how to deploy Gemini 1.5 Pro/Flash and upcoming 2.x models through Vertex AI, keeping their own API keys and quotas. Its middleware injects course prompts, supports multimodal and function calls, and dashboards track token spend, latency, and compliance—letting admins toggle Flash for routine chat and Pro for deep research.
How ibl.ai Integrates with OpenAI: A Guide to Model Options and Deployment Flexibility
ibl.ai’s guide walks campuses through plugging any GPT model—using a self-managed key or private Azure cluster—while keeping data FERPA-safe. Its middleware routes prompts, logs and meters token spend, and unlocks embeddings, Whisper, and DALL·E upgrades without changing course code.
ChatGPT and ibl.ai: Partners in AI-Enhanced Higher Education
Pair ChatGPT’s conversational AI with ibl.ai backend to combine language brilliance with campus-grade governance, integrations, and analytics—real-world deployments prove the duo cuts costs, boosts faculty control, and delights students without vendor lock-in.
Google: Agents Companion
The document "Agents Companion" outlines advancements in generative AI agents, detailing an architecture that goes beyond traditional language models by integrating models, tools, and orchestration. It emphasizes the importance of Agent Ops—combining DevOps and MLOps principles—with rigorous automated and human-in-the-loop evaluation metrics and showcases the benefits of multi-agent systems for handling complex tasks.
UC San Diego: Large Language Models Pass the Turing Test
Researchers found that GPT-4.5, when adopting a humanlike persona, convinced human interrogators of its humanity more often than real human participants, demonstrating that advanced LLMs can pass the three-party Turing test.
Elon University: Being Human in 2035 – How Are We Changing in the Age of AI?
The report examines how advanced AI might reshape human capacities by 2035, suggesting potential losses in empathy, identity, and critical thinking, while also highlighting opportunities for increased curiosity, creativity, and problem-solving. It stresses the need for ethical AI development and human-centered policies to ensure technology augments rather than diminishes essential human qualities.
Bain & Company: Nvidia GTC 2025 – AI Matures into Enterprise Infrastructure
Nvidia's GTC 2025 shows that AI has moved from experimental projects to a core element of enterprise infrastructure. Companies are shifting focus to clean, connected data while using AI not only to analyze but also to generate insights. Smaller, specialized AI models, along with semi-autonomous systems with human oversight, are becoming standard. Additionally, tools like digital twins and simulation platforms are being widely adopted to enhance decision-making and cross-functional collaboration.
Anthropic: Circuit Tracing – Revealing Computational Graphs in Language Models
The paper introduces "circuit tracing," a method for uncovering how language models process information by mapping their computational steps via attribution graphs. This approach uses replacement models and Cross-Layer Transcoders to connect low-level features with high-level behaviors, demonstrated in tasks like acronym generation and addition, while also noting limitations such as fixed attention patterns and reconstruction errors.
RAND: Uneven Adoption of AI Tools Among U.S. Teachers and Principals in the 2023-2024 School Year
A RAND report on the 2023-2024 school year finds that while many U.S. K–12 educators are incorporating AI—about 25% of teachers primarily for instructional planning and nearly 60% of principals for administrative tasks—usage varies significantly by subject and school poverty levels. Schools in lower-poverty areas have higher AI adoption and more support, highlighting concerns over unequal access and the need for targeted training and policies.
Stanford University: Expanding Academia's Role in Public Sector AI
Stanford HAI's brief highlights that industry’s superior access to data and computing power is leaving academia trailing in frontier AI research. This imbalance risks stifling public-interest AI innovation and weakening the future talent pipeline. To counteract these challenges, the brief calls for more public investment, collaborative research models, and the establishment of government-supported academic institutions to ensure that academia remains a key player in AI development for the public good.
University of Texas at Austin: Protecting Human Cognition in the Age of AI
Generative AI is transforming the way we think and learn by offering both increased productivity and risks like weakened critical thinking and reflective skills. The study applies educational frameworks to illustrate concerns over cognitive offloading, especially for novice learners, and calls for a redesign of teaching methods to help sustain deeper cognitive engagement.
University of Bristol: Alice in Wonderland – Simple Tasks Showing Complete Reasoning Breakdown in State-of-the-Art LLMs
The study introduces the "Alice in Wonderland" problem to reveal that even state-of-the-art LLMs, such as GPT-4 and Claude 3 Opus, struggle with basic reasoning and generalization. Despite high scores on standard benchmarks, these models show significant performance fluctuations and overconfidence in their incorrect answers when faced with minor problem variations, suggesting that current evaluations might overestimate their true reasoning abilities.
NIST: Adversarial Machine Learning – A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations
The report outlines a taxonomy for adversarial machine learning, defining key terms and categorizing attacks—such as poisoning, evasion, privacy breaches, and prompt injection—for both predictive and generative AI systems. It discusses the trade-offs between security and performance and highlights challenges in balancing accuracy with adversarial robustness, aiming to guide standards and practices in securing AI systems.
Purdue University: The Emergence of AI Ethics Auditing
AI ethics auditing is an emerging field that mirrors financial auditing but currently faces challenges such as limited stakeholder involvement, unclear success metrics, and a predominance of technical focus. Despite regulatory push (e.g., EU AI Act) driving its adoption, organizations struggle with resource constraints and ambiguous standards, while auditors work to develop frameworks and interpret evolving regulations.
Nature: The Mental Health Implications of AI Adoption – The Crucial Role of Self-Efficacy
The study finds that while AI adoption indirectly increases burnout by elevating job stress, employees with higher self-efficacy in AI learning experience less stress. Organizations can mitigate these negative effects by investing in AI training and fostering confidence in using new technologies.
ECIIA: The AI Act – Road to Compliance
The content is a guide for internal auditors on achieving compliance with the EU AI Act, which uses a risk-based framework to categorize AI systems and imposes varying obligations. It outlines roles and responsibilities within the AI value chain, details a phased implementation timeline, and emphasizes the need for organizations to prepare by inventorying and assessing their AI systems. A survey of over 40 companies indicates widespread AI adoption but a lack of deep understanding of the Act among internal auditors, highlighting the need for enhanced AI risk auditing skills and training.
Harvard Business School: The Cybernetic Teammate – A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise
The paper shows that generative AI can act as a "cybernetic teammate" by considerably enhancing knowledge work. In field experiments at Procter & Gamble, individuals using AI achieved performance comparable to human teams, produced balanced solutions across functional lines, and experienced more positive emotions. Overall, the study suggests that AI not only boosts efficiency but also transforms team dynamics and innovation strategies.
Baruch College: Not all AI is Created Equal – A Meta-Analysis Revealing Drivers of AI Resistance Across Markets, Methods, and Time
The meta-analysis reveals that while consumers generally show a slight aversion to AI (Cohen’s d = -0.21), resistance is context-dependent—stronger for embodied forms like robots and high-risk domains—and evolves over time, with negative evaluations decreasing, especially in settings with greater ecological validity.
CSET: Putting Explainable AI to the Test – A Critical Look at Evaluation Approaches
The brief discusses how explainable AI is evaluated in recommendation systems, highlighting a lack of clear definitions for key concepts and an overemphasis on system correctness rather than real-world effectiveness. Researchers mainly use case studies and comparative evaluations, with less focus on methods that assess operational impact. The study concludes that clearer standards and expert evaluation methods are needed to ensure that explainable AI is genuinely effective.
Harvard Business School: The Value of Open Source Software
This study reveals that open source software (OSS) provides massive economic benefits, with a small supply-side cost of about $4.15 billion versus an enormous demand-side value around $8.8 trillion, emphasizing its crucial role in saving costs and boosting productivity across industries.
Hoover Institution: The Artificially Intelligent Boardroom
Artificial intelligence is set to reshape corporate boardrooms by enhancing information processing, decision-making, and various governance functions. At the same time, its adoption raises challenges such as maintaining board independence, managing data security, and avoiding potential biases in AI models.
Harvard Business School: Why Most Resist AI Companions
Research indicates that despite AI companions offering benefits like constant availability and non-judgment, people resist forming genuine relationships with them because they believe AI lacks the core emotional depth and mutual caring required for true interpersonal connections.