Blog
Insights on agentic AI, from agent architectures and LLM infrastructure to enterprise deployment and developer tooling. Our team shares practical guides on building AI agents, optimizing model pipelines, and scaling AI systems in production.
Written for CTOs, developers, AI engineers, and technical leaders who are building or deploying agentic AI. Each article includes actionable takeaways grounded in real-world implementation.
Our editorial team publishes new content weekly, drawing on deployment data from 400+ organizations and 1.6M+ users. Every piece is reviewed by practitioners with hands-on experience building AI platforms.
Explore Topics
Building, deploying, and managing autonomous AI agents for workflow automation, customer support, internal operations, and more.
LLM InfrastructureModel selection, hosting, fine-tuning, cost optimization, and scaling LLM-powered systems in production.
Enterprise AIStrategies for deploying AI at scale across organizations, including governance, compliance, and change management.
Developer ToolsMCP servers, CLIs, SDKs, APIs, and open source tooling for building on agentic AI platforms.
IndustryAI applications across education, healthcare, finance, government, and other verticals.
ConferencesTranscripts and key takeaways from major education and AI conferences including ASU+GSV Summit.
Showing 865-888 of 922 posts
University of Cologne: AI Meets the Classroom – When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
LLMs can aid coding education when used as personal tutors by explaining concepts, but over-reliance on them for solving exercises—especially via copy-and-paste—can impair actual learning and lead students to overestimate their progress.
MIT Sloan: AI Detectors Don't Work – Here's What to Do Instead
AI detection tools are unreliable; instead, educators should set clear AI use guidelines, foster open discussions, and design engaging, inclusive assignments to promote genuine learning.
Anthropic: Which Economic Tasks Are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations
The study analyzes four million Claude.ai conversations mapped to US occupational tasks, revealing that AI is mainly used to augment specific tasks—especially in software development, writing, and other cognitive roles—rather than to replace entire jobs. It finds that mid-to-high wage occupations are using AI significantly, with different models specializing in distinct tasks, highlighting a nuanced, task-specific impact of AI on the economy.
University of Cambridge: Imagine While Reasoning in Space – Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought
MVoT is a novel multimodal reasoning approach that integrates visualizations with textual explanations to enhance complex spatial reasoning in large language models. It outperforms traditional chain-of-thought methods by offering improved interpretability, robust performance in complex environments, and enhanced image quality through token discrepancy loss, and it can complement existing models like GPT-4o.
Microsoft: The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking – Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers
A study of 319 knowledge workers found that while generative AI reduces the cognitive effort needed for tasks, it may also decrease active critical thinking. Higher confidence in AI correlates with less user engagement in critical evaluation, shifting work from direct content creation to overseeing AI outputs. Motivators like improving work quality and avoiding errors encourage critical thinking, whereas a lack of awareness and motivation can hinder it.
University of Oxford: Who Should Develop Which AI Evaluations?
The memo proposes a framework for assigning AI evaluation development to various actors—government, contractors, third-party organizations, and AI companies—by using four approaches and nine criteria that balance risk, method requirements, and conflicts of interest, while advocating for a market-based ecosystem to support high-quality evaluations.
University of Texas at Dallas: Human-in-the-Loop or AI-in-the-Loop? Automate or Collaborate?
The discussion contrasts Human-in-the-Loop (HIL) systems, where AI leads and humans assist, with AI-in-the-Loop (AI2L) systems that place humans in control with the AI serving as support. The summary highlights the need for a shift toward human-centric evaluations emphasizing interpretability, fairness, and trust, and argues that AI2L is better suited for complex tasks requiring human expertise.
AI Action Summit: The International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI
The report examines the rapid progress and associated risks of advanced AI, highlighting technical challenges, energy demands, cybersecurity threats, potential misuse, and systemic issues. It stresses the need for responsible development, inclusive risk management, and refined policy-making to balance AI’s benefits with its inherent dangers.
Carnegie Mellon University: Two Types of AI Existential Risk – Decisive and Accumulative
The content outlines two hypotheses on AI existential risk: one where a single catastrophic event from superintelligent AI causes collapse (decisive risk), and another where multiple smaller disruptions gradually erode societal resilience until a tipping point is reached (accumulative risk). It presents a "MISTER" scenario demonstrating how various AI-related threats interconnect and calls for a holistic, integrated approach to AI risk governance that combines ethical, social, and existential considerations.
U.S. Copyright Office: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
The report explains that only works with enough human creative input are eligible for copyright protection. While AI-generated content lacks sufficient human authorship, using AI as a tool or modifying its output can be copyrighted if human expression is evident. The office maintains that existing copyright law is adequate for addressing these issues, emphasizing the central role of human creativity.
European Commission: AI Act Article 5 – Prohibited Practices
The guidelines outline prohibited AI practices under the EU AI Act, including harmful manipulation and deceptive techniques, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, unauthorized biometric and emotion recognition applications, and real-time biometric identification restrictions. They emphasize transparency, legal safeguards, and a balance between innovation and fundamental rights protection, while also noting the interplay with other EU laws.
Centre for Future Generations: CERN for AI – The EU's Seat at the Table
The report proposes the creation of a centralized "CERN for AI" in Europe, backed by €30-35 billion over three years, to foster innovation in advanced, trustworthy AI, bolster economic competitiveness, and enhance strategic autonomy through enhanced public-private collaboration and robust infrastructure.
University of Memphis: Generative AI in Education – From AutoTutor to the Socratic Playground
The research paper explores how generative AI and large language models can transform education through advanced tutoring systems like the Socratic Playground, emphasizing a pedagogy-first approach, human oversight, and adaptable, interactive learning methods that enhance critical thinking and understanding.
Digital Education Council: Global AI Meets Academia Faculty Survey 2025
The survey shows that while many faculty see AI as an opportunity and are beginning to integrate it into teaching, they remain cautious due to concerns over student reliance, unclear institutional guidelines, and a lack of adequate AI literacy resources.
New York City: 2025 Artificial Intelligence Advantage – Driving Economic Growth and Technological Transformation
NYC’s 2025 AI report highlights the city’s robust talent pool, venture capital investment, and vibrant startup ecosystem as key drivers in its emerging AI landscape. It also addresses challenges in responsible AI development, workforce transitions, and regulation, while proposing initiatives to promote inclusive, innovative growth in the field.
Northeastern University: Foundations of Large Language Models
Summary: The content explores foundational methods and advanced techniques in large language model development, including pre-training, generative architectures like Transformers, scaling strategies, alignment through reinforcement learning and instruction fine-tuning, and various prompting methods.
Princeton University: Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents
CoALA is a framework that repurposes cognitive architecture concepts from symbolic AI to enhance large language models, aiming to improve reasoning, grounding, learning, and decision-making in language agents.
Georgia Department of Education: Leveraging AI in the K-12 Setting
This document guides K-12 educators in ethically and effectively integrating AI, emphasizing data privacy, compliance with federal regulations, thorough vetting of tools, staff training, transparency, human oversight, and safe classroom practices.
Peking University: Beware of Metacognitive Laziness – Effects of Generative AI on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance
This study examined how using ChatGPT impacts university students' learning by comparing its use with human expert support, writing analytics tools, and no support. While ChatGPT improved essay scores, it did not significantly boost intrinsic motivation or knowledge transfer, suggesting an over-reliance on AI—termed "metacognitive laziness"—that may inhibit deeper learning.
MIT AI Risk Repository: Latest Update
The MIT AI Risk Repository catalogs over 3,000 real-world AI incidents and organizes key risks into two taxonomies—causal and domain-specific. It highlights major concerns including AI safety failures, socioeconomic harms, discrimination, privacy breaches, malicious misuse, misinformation, and unsafe human interactions with AI.
American Association of Colleges and Universities: Leading Through Disruption – Higher Education Executives Assess AI’s Impacts on Teaching and Learning
The report, based on a survey of 337 higher ed leaders by AAC&U and Elon University, finds that while 91% believe AI can enhance learning, significant challenges remain. Only 2% of leaders feel faculty are AI-ready, with 65% concerned that new grads are underprepared for AI-driven workplaces. Faculty struggles with spotting AI-generated work and resistance to AI adoption, alongside concerns about academic integrity and deep learning, underscore the urgent need for policy updates, curriculum changes, and professional development.
Google: From Data to Discovery – AI's Role in Higher Education
Google outlines a roadmap for higher education to harness AI through better data management, overcoming challenges like dark and siloed data, enhancing data literacy, and using strategic partnerships and tools for improved decision-making and student outcomes.
Udacity: 2025 State of AI at Work
Udacity's 2025 State of AI at Work report reveals a major skills gap in AI training across industries, with only one-third of workers receiving adequate resources. The report, drawing on responses from 850 professionals in 87 countries, finds that while millennials view AI as a tool for efficiency and revenue growth, this positive sentiment is less shared by Gen Z and Gen X. Popular AI tools include writing assistants and image generators, underscoring the need for enhanced AI training and data literacy.
Google: How AI is Building the Campus of Tomorrow
The content highlights how higher education institutions are integrating generative AI to tackle challenges like declining enrollment and budget constraints while enhancing personalized learning, research, and administrative efficiency.