Blog
Insights on agentic AI, from agent architectures and LLM infrastructure to enterprise deployment and developer tooling. Our team shares practical guides on building AI agents, optimizing model pipelines, and scaling AI systems in production.
Written for CTOs, developers, AI engineers, and technical leaders who are building or deploying agentic AI. Each article includes actionable takeaways grounded in real-world implementation.
Our editorial team publishes new content weekly, drawing on deployment data from 400+ organizations and 1.6M+ users. Every piece is reviewed by practitioners with hands-on experience building AI platforms.
Explore Topics
Building, deploying, and managing autonomous AI agents for workflow automation, customer support, internal operations, and more.
LLM InfrastructureModel selection, hosting, fine-tuning, cost optimization, and scaling LLM-powered systems in production.
Enterprise AIStrategies for deploying AI at scale across organizations, including governance, compliance, and change management.
Developer ToolsMCP servers, CLIs, SDKs, APIs, and open source tooling for building on agentic AI platforms.
IndustryAI applications across education, healthcare, finance, government, and other verticals.
ConferencesTranscripts and key takeaways from major education and AI conferences including ASU+GSV Summit.
Showing 913-936 of 982 posts
George Mason University: Generative AI in Higher Education – Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines
Higher education institutions are increasingly embracing generative AI, particularly for writing tasks, with many providing detailed classroom guidance. However, they also face ethical, privacy, and pedagogical challenges, as well as concerns about the long-term impact on intellectual growth.
Digital Education Council: Global AI Faculty Survey 2025
The survey reveals that most faculty have experimented with AI in teaching, though its use tends to be limited. Many are worried about students’ over-reliance on AI and their ability to critically assess its output, while also noting that institutions lack clear AI guidance. Additionally, a significant number advocate for reforming student assessments, although a strong majority remain optimistic about the future integration of AI in teaching.
Google: Towards an AI Co-Scientist
The AI co-scientist is a multi-agent system that accelerates biomedical research by generating, debating, and refining hypotheses through iterative improvements and expert feedback, with its capabilities validated in drug repurposing, target discovery, and antimicrobial resistance.
OpenAI: Building an AI-Ready Workforce – A Look at College Student ChatGPT Adoption in the US
OpenAI's report finds that many US college students are self-learning AI skills, leading to uneven adoption across states, and emphasizes the urgent need for clear institutional and nationwide AI education policies to build an AI-ready workforce.
MIT: The AI Agent Index
The MIT AI Agent Index is a public database that catalogs agentic AI systems—tools capable of planning and executing tasks with minimal human oversight—by detailing their technical components, applications, and risk management practices. It reveals that most systems are developed in the USA, mainly by companies in software engineering, and while many projects offer open code and documentation, information on safety policies and external evaluations remains limited.
Artificial Analysis: State of AI in China – Q1 2025
Chinese AI labs have achieved language model and reasoning capabilities comparable to leading US technologies, aided by strong government and Big Tech support. The report also highlights the impact of US export controls on NVIDIA accelerators and outlines detailed hardware benchmarks for AI development.
OWASP: LLM Applications Cybersecurity and Governance Checklist
The document outlines a cybersecurity checklist for organizations using large language models (LLMs). It emphasizes balancing the benefits and risks of LLMs, incorporating security measures into existing practices, providing specialized AI security training, and implementing continuous testing and validation to ensure ethical deployment and robust defenses against threats.
ETS: 2025 Human Progress Report
The report reveals a global shift toward skills-based credentials—particularly AI literacy and continuous learning—as critical for advancing education and career growth, while highlighting both rising progress and ongoing concerns about tech obsolescence, especially among Gen Z.
University College London: How Human-AI Feedback Loops Alter Human Perceptual, Emotional and Social Judgements
This study finds that AI systems can amplify human biases when trained on slightly skewed data. Interactions with biased AI can further increase human bias, particularly when users view AI as more authoritative. However, accurate AI systems have the potential to improve human judgment.
University of California Irvine: What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Know
The study reveals that users tend to overestimate large language models' accuracy due to discrepancies between the models' internal confidence and the users' interpretation, with longer explanations and specific uncertainty language boosting user confidence regardless of actual accuracy. Tailoring LLM responses to better reflect internal uncertainty can help bridge this calibration gap, improving trustworthiness in AI-assisted decisions.
Stanford University: The Labor Market Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Stanford's research finds that around 30% of workers have used Generative AI at work, with particularly high adoption among younger, educated, and higher-income individuals in customer service, marketing, and IT; users experience significant productivity gains, often reducing task times by two-thirds, indicating that Generative AI can both replace and enhance various forms of labor.
Hugging Face: Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not Be Developed
The paper argues that fully autonomous AI agents, which operate without human oversight, pose serious risks to safety, security, and privacy. It recommends favoring semi-autonomous systems with maintained human control to balance potential benefits like efficiency and assistance against vulnerabilities in accuracy, consistency, and overall risk.
University of Cologne: AI Meets the Classroom – When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
LLMs can aid coding education when used as personal tutors by explaining concepts, but over-reliance on them for solving exercises—especially via copy-and-paste—can impair actual learning and lead students to overestimate their progress.
MIT Sloan: AI Detectors Don't Work – Here's What to Do Instead
AI detection tools are unreliable; instead, educators should set clear AI use guidelines, foster open discussions, and design engaging, inclusive assignments to promote genuine learning.
Anthropic: Which Economic Tasks Are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations
The study analyzes four million Claude.ai conversations mapped to US occupational tasks, revealing that AI is mainly used to augment specific tasks—especially in software development, writing, and other cognitive roles—rather than to replace entire jobs. It finds that mid-to-high wage occupations are using AI significantly, with different models specializing in distinct tasks, highlighting a nuanced, task-specific impact of AI on the economy.
University of Cambridge: Imagine While Reasoning in Space – Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought
MVoT is a novel multimodal reasoning approach that integrates visualizations with textual explanations to enhance complex spatial reasoning in large language models. It outperforms traditional chain-of-thought methods by offering improved interpretability, robust performance in complex environments, and enhanced image quality through token discrepancy loss, and it can complement existing models like GPT-4o.
Microsoft: The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking – Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers
A study of 319 knowledge workers found that while generative AI reduces the cognitive effort needed for tasks, it may also decrease active critical thinking. Higher confidence in AI correlates with less user engagement in critical evaluation, shifting work from direct content creation to overseeing AI outputs. Motivators like improving work quality and avoiding errors encourage critical thinking, whereas a lack of awareness and motivation can hinder it.
University of Oxford: Who Should Develop Which AI Evaluations?
The memo proposes a framework for assigning AI evaluation development to various actors—government, contractors, third-party organizations, and AI companies—by using four approaches and nine criteria that balance risk, method requirements, and conflicts of interest, while advocating for a market-based ecosystem to support high-quality evaluations.
University of Texas at Dallas: Human-in-the-Loop or AI-in-the-Loop? Automate or Collaborate?
The discussion contrasts Human-in-the-Loop (HIL) systems, where AI leads and humans assist, with AI-in-the-Loop (AI2L) systems that place humans in control with the AI serving as support. The summary highlights the need for a shift toward human-centric evaluations emphasizing interpretability, fairness, and trust, and argues that AI2L is better suited for complex tasks requiring human expertise.
AI Action Summit: The International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI
The report examines the rapid progress and associated risks of advanced AI, highlighting technical challenges, energy demands, cybersecurity threats, potential misuse, and systemic issues. It stresses the need for responsible development, inclusive risk management, and refined policy-making to balance AI’s benefits with its inherent dangers.
Carnegie Mellon University: Two Types of AI Existential Risk – Decisive and Accumulative
The content outlines two hypotheses on AI existential risk: one where a single catastrophic event from superintelligent AI causes collapse (decisive risk), and another where multiple smaller disruptions gradually erode societal resilience until a tipping point is reached (accumulative risk). It presents a "MISTER" scenario demonstrating how various AI-related threats interconnect and calls for a holistic, integrated approach to AI risk governance that combines ethical, social, and existential considerations.
U.S. Copyright Office: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
The report explains that only works with enough human creative input are eligible for copyright protection. While AI-generated content lacks sufficient human authorship, using AI as a tool or modifying its output can be copyrighted if human expression is evident. The office maintains that existing copyright law is adequate for addressing these issues, emphasizing the central role of human creativity.
European Commission: AI Act Article 5 – Prohibited Practices
The guidelines outline prohibited AI practices under the EU AI Act, including harmful manipulation and deceptive techniques, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, unauthorized biometric and emotion recognition applications, and real-time biometric identification restrictions. They emphasize transparency, legal safeguards, and a balance between innovation and fundamental rights protection, while also noting the interplay with other EU laws.
Centre for Future Generations: CERN for AI – The EU's Seat at the Table
The report proposes the creation of a centralized "CERN for AI" in Europe, backed by €30-35 billion over three years, to foster innovation in advanced, trustworthy AI, bolster economic competitiveness, and enhance strategic autonomy through enhanced public-private collaboration and robust infrastructure.